The political agenda has found its way into a belief system

The last thing the kids save when you pass away is what you thought was important. It’s just a fact of life. When you think you are on the same page with them, most times you aren’t. Like Thanksgiving this covid year of 2020, while my daughter will not even allow me to speak about covid with her, I thought my son and I were sort of close to being on the same page. Somewhat we are, but, somewhat not, and it comes from me having way too much time to do research on my hands and him having none at all. He knows something is not right and attributes it to a theory that is, in part, right about population control. What he is missing is the scientific part of it that I have been able to look into. The part that statistically makes the science valid. For example (and I have seen this written about many times but this is the clearest)

COURTESY OF GENEVIEVE BRIAND

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September.

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths.

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.   From <http://web.archive.org/web/20201126043553/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19>

Yes, this was lab created and with much effort to make it virulent (gain-of-function), but it just seems that a 30% of the population already has immunity going for it due to the fact that this is a corona virus – and not a living thing on the planet hasn’t had it. The numbers have begun to show that the common flu/cold/influenza just might be worse (more virulent) than the dreaded (duh, duh, dun) CV19.

“It is now established that at least 30% of our population already had immunological recognition of this new virus, before it even arrived…COVID-19 is new, but coronaviruses are not.”   From <https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/pandemic-over-former-pfizer-chief-science-officer-says-second-wave-faked-false-positive?s=09>

But my son is coming from a place of love, and he told me straight out that he could not bear it if anything made me get sick and possibly die. Bless his heart – even as it breaks mine. But the assholes are smart, and this is exactly what has gotten to the majority of people out there that have a heart – because, love. Love with no facts. That and all the scary shit from the mouthpiece of the CIA (the media) who think they run this country. Not only that, but the assholes have politicized a medical issue (!) and then turned it into a new belief system that has no basis in fact, and driven it home with emotion and paralyzed the country.

How do you politicize a medical issue? You confuse the issue twist the facts and then connect an outrageous idea to it. Like, for instance, there is no such thing a ‘a little bit pregnant’. You either are, or you aren’t. However if you want to conceal the issue, you could always claim you are getting fat, go away for a vacation, deliver the child and bring it back with a tragic story about your sister’s boyfriends’ cousin’s daughter dying in child birth while you were visiting and how you have adopted this baby…etc.

But then how do you translate that into a belief system? Just like any religious cult, (sorry guys) you create a story with a moral and make the consequences so horrendous that no one is willing to even think about the them, then you haul in a bunch of experts and witnesses, professionals (not anyone too smart – just ambitious) or someone who has an agenda that fits with your story, and you use them for the icing on the cake and Voila! You have a new belief system – easy as pie (err, cake…). You cement it together with mass propaganda, fake stories, fake news and keep knocking people over the head with the wrong information while also hiding any information that goes against your story, or using the purveyor of said conflicting information as an example of stupidity and you can’t fail!

The head of the NIH is not the best scientist, it’s the best politician. (NIH is the National Institute of Health)

All this wild and reckless government policy has never been about the science.

It’s politics and panic.

We’re basing policy that is affecting billions of humans on data that is uninterpretable gibberish.

It’s a deranged technocrat’s wet dream, but for those of us along for the ride, it’s a nightmare.

Testing is not the solution, it’s the problem.

Any technocrat or scientist that does not know this by now is either unfit for their job or has decided that they just don’t care and prefer power to morality.

This is, of curse, precisely the kind of person who winds up running a gov’t agency… oopsie.

From <https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/pandemic-over-former-pfizer-chief-science-officer-says-second-wave-faked-false-positive?s=09>

Aside from just plain old manipulation, the fight also goes to people wanting to protect what is theirs, to be safe, to not see the government spend their S.S. money, afraid in their old age that nothing will be there. Then others want to fight for the freedom of their thoughts and body, and they are willing to go through hell and back for that right. On both sides, their vision is just not big enough.

The fight is for a global vision, it’s much bigger than personal vision. It’s planetary. To that end, a lot of people are beginning to feel like it’s almost biblical. Like the book of revelation (the last book of the bible) is a script that is playing out and there is no way off that train.

IMO there is. It requires understanding yourself better – in allegory or metaphor. It also requires that we understand ‘Darkness’ as unrevealed instead of bad. The only reason people equate dark and bad is because if you refuse to see an aspect of yourself, i.e.: keep it dark, then you have a place where you can be controlled and never know it – because you are purposefully NOT looking there. But if you make friends with that part of yourself, not only do you get to decide your choices, instead of them being decided for you, you become doubly powerful because you are united. You will never be forced to act against your will.

The dark is simply unknown, not bad. You can’t kill your dark side, it works with your light or conscious side to create motion, the same way neg & pos particles create flow. The more you work with your entire self, the more flow you will have, and the more aware you are of your subconscious side, the less ‘sub’ it becomes, the more conscious it is, the more prescient your life becomes. The more prescient it is, the less bamboozle works on you and the freer you become, the more you know, the less you have to believe anything.

I think I’ve brought this full circle…

2 thoughts on “The political agenda has found its way into a belief system”

  1. We all have a dark side, we just have to control that side more than our light side. The dark side used to only peek out occasionally, but in this climate, it has been given permission to walk among us and sneer at our light side. We can only hope our light side will prevail and push the dark side back where it belongs.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thats the problem, that dark side is an integral part of our wholeness. We need to metaphorically invite its wisdom into the bright light of our consciousness, and then things like bad behavior don’t happen with out a measured choice. It’s an ally. IMO…

    Like

Leave a Reply to In the Mind's Eye Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s