Tag: CONSENSUS

Science and Spirit: tricky words

The words spirit and spiritual are terms used to identify almost anything unseen. Jung brings up a good point about their usage in a lecture delivered to the literary Society of Augsburg, 20 October 1926, on the theme of “Nature and Spirit”:

The connection between spirit and life is one of those problems involving factors of such complexity that we have to be on our guard lest we ourselves get caught in the net of words in which we seek to ensnare these great enigmas. For how can we bring into the orbit of our thought those limitless complexities of life which we call “Spirit” or “Life” unless we clothe them in verbal concepts, themselves mere counters of the intellect? The mistrust of verbal concepts, inconvenient as it is, nevertheless seems to me to be very much in place in speaking of fundamentals. “Spirit” and “Life” are familiar enough words to us, very old acquaintances in fact, pawns that for thousands of years have been pushed back and forth on the thinker’s chessboard. The problem must have begun in the grey dawn of time, when someone made the bewildering discovery that the living breath which left the body of the dying man in the last death-rattle meant more than just air in motion. It can scarcely be an accident onomatopoeic words like ruach (Hebrew), ruch (Arabic), roho (Swahili) mean ‘spirit’ no less clearly than πνεύμα (pneuma, Greek) and spiritus (Latin).[13]

 

The unseen world exists or we would not have all the words for it we do. I know the following is lengthy, not only to illustrate how it all gets lumped up and interchanged, but also in effort to find words for in ineffable, the unseen, but felt and known. The language itself enfolds proof for the unseen. These terms are as old as the roots of our languages are.

spir·it

/ˈspirit/

noun

noun: spirit; plural noun: spirits

Spirit – Latin

Breath, breathing; breeze, air; inspiration; character; arrogance

From <http://latindictionary.wikidot.com/noun:spiritus>

 

Spirit – Etymology

The English word “spirit” comes from the Latin spiritus,but also “spirit, soul, courage, vigor”, ultimately from a Proto-Indo-European *(s)peis. It is distinguished from Latin anima, “soul” (which nonetheless also derives from an Indo-European root meaning “to breathe”, earliest form *h2enh1-).[4] In Greek, this distinction exists between pneuma (πνεῦμα), “breath, motile air, spirit,” and psykhē (ψυχή), “soul”[1

From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit>

 

Definitions

Spirit:

the nonphysical part of a person which is the seat of emotions and character; the soul.
“we seek a harmony between body and spirit”

synonyms: soul, psyche, inner self, inner being, essential being; More

pneuma;

anima, ego, id;

ka;

atman

“we seek a harmony between body and spirit”
antonyms: body, flesh

the nonphysical part of a person regarded as their true self and as capable of surviving physical death or separation.
“a year after he left, his spirit is still present”

synonyms: life force, animating principle, vital spark, breath of life;

élan vital

“the spirit of nature”

the nonphysical part of a person manifested as an apparition after their death; a ghost.

synonyms: ghost, phantom, specter, apparition, wraith, shadow, presence; More

bodach; Doppelgänger; duppy; spook; phantasm, shade, revenant, visitant, wight; eidolon, manes

“local people say that his spirit walks among the hills”

a supernatural being. “shrines to nature spirits”   short for Holy Spirit.

those qualities regarded as forming the definitive or typical elements in the character of a person, nation, or group or in the thought and attitudes of a particular period.
“the university is a symbol of the nation’s egalitarian spirit”

synonyms: ethos, prevailing tendency, motivating force, animating principle, dominating characteristic, essence, quintessence; More

atmosphere, mood, feeling, temper, tenor, climate;

attitudes, beliefs, principles, standards, ethics

“the spirit of the nineteenth century”

a person identified with their most prominent mental or moral characteristics or with their role in a group or movement.   “he was a leading spirit in the conference”

a specified emotion or mood, especially one prevailing at a particular time. “I hope the team will build on this spirit of confidence” a person’s mood.
the attitude or intentions with which someone undertakes or regards something. “he confessed in a spirit of self-respect, not defiance”

synonyms: temperament, disposition, character, nature, personality, temper, makeup, humor, cast/turn of mind, complexion;

mind, heart “this thought dampened even my optimistic spirit”

attitude, frame of mind, way of thinking, way of looking at it, state of mind, point of view, outlook, thoughts, ideas   “she’s got the right spirit”

mood, frame of mind, state of mind, emotional state, humor, temper   “she was in good spirits when I left”

the quality of courage, energy, and determination or assertiveness. “his visitors admired his spirit and good temper”

synonym: morale, team spirit; esprit de corps “the spirit of the team is high”

courage, bravery, courageousness, braveness, pluck, pluckiness, valor, strength of character, fortitude, backbone, spine, mettle, stout-heartedness, determination, firmness of purpose, resolution, resoluteness, resolve, fight, gameness; guts, grit, spunk; bottle; sand, moxie animation, enthusiasm, eagerness, keenness, liveliness, vivacity, vivaciousness, energy, verve, vigor, dynamism, zest, dash, elan, panache, sparkle, exuberance, gusto, brio, pep, go, sap, fervor, zeal, fire, passion; pizzazz, oomph, zing, zip, zap, vim, get-up-and-go

 

the real meaning or the intention behind something as opposed to its strict verbal interpretation. “the rule had been broken in spirit if not in letter”

synonyms: real/true meaning, true intention, essence, substance

“we must be seen to keep to the spirit of the law as well as the letter”

British – strong distilled liquor such as brandy, whiskey, gin, or rum.

synonyms: strong liquor, liquor, strong drink; More

gin, vodka, whiskey, brandy, rum; shorts, firewater, hooch

 

a volatile liquid, especially a fuel, prepared by distillation. “aviation spirit”

archaic
a solution of volatile components extracted from something, typically by distillation or by solution in alcohol. “spirits of turpentine” a highly refined substance or fluid thought to govern vital phenomena.

 

Spiritual – Metaphysical terms

An incorporeal but ubiquitous, non-quantifiable substance or energy present individually in all living things. Unlike the concept of souls (often regarded as eternal and sometimes believed to pre-exist the body) a spirit develops and grows as an integral aspect of a living being.[9]

 

From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit>

Then we have the word Science which comes from Latin and means:

 

sci·ence

Latin – Scire

To know, understand http://latindictionary.wikidot.com/verb:scir

noun: science

the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
“the world of science and technology”

synonyms: branch of knowledge, body of knowledge/information/facts, area of study, discipline, field “the science of criminology”

a particular area of science.
“

Archaic – knowledge of any kind.
“his rare science and his practical skill”

The thought of the day is that science and spirituality, or spirit are not opposites, like todays general idea of them would have you think. And science doesn’t just study the physical side of life, it also studies the energetic, or spirit side of life too. (air is unseeable so are may gasses, not to mention the quantum side of things or what we do with sound….etc.) So this current idea of a split between science and spirit and not being able to use science to study, describe or quantify spirit is irrational. It is also a piece of programming that has held back the study of things unseen for about two thousand years (except in some circles) and stunted our knowledge base on purpose.

Science can study spirit the same as it studies all other matters and in some circles it has, thus we have our breakaway civilizations, and secret societies and mystery schools. Knowledge is power, and until the Guttenberg press was invented, regular society never even knew what the bible said. Now with the internet, we all have the opportunity to know anything…except those facts that science has discovered about spirit.

So my next question would be WHY? The only answer I have been able to come up with is that it would equalize the world too much such that those in power wouldn’t be able to stay in power. When you listen to fellows like Joe McMoneagle talk (who swears we are all spiritually endowed) and Russell Targ, or Rupert Sheldrake or Stewart Hameroff you realize there have been some real trailblazers out there as of late. Then you listen to people like Garry Nolan (who is working with Kit Green et al) in an interview on Phenomenon Radio try so very hard to use the ‘correct’ words to describe the intersect between spirit and science and his research in order not to incur the wrath of ‘normal science professionals’ and, well, I feel very sorry for the man. It’s obvious that he has such a passion for the research and yet, like Jung said in the paragraph above, the words become a tangle and a weapon which could be turned back against him if he is not scrupulous with them. Yet, you hear the passion he has for his work, and his hopes and expectations in the tone of his voice that says as much if not more than his words – all aspects of the unseen and spirit…

You see my point? It’s not so much what the unseen is, as it is that we have been taught that we mustn’t ever, ever, ever look at it square in the face. (but what is more fun than sticking your nose in where is doesn’t belong??? Lol)

Whether is it timing (the procession of the earth and the Yugas) or it is knowledge (the availability of information) causing a tipping point, the intervention of cosmic forces (ET’s, ID’s and the like, both benevolent and malevolent: bene-good mal-bad) or all of the above, the tipping point has been reached. But instead of only one direction, there are many, and when this is through, this opening up, it will be billions of directions, not just one, creating a singularity of unimagined proportions that will truly become the new human – the new identity that when we look back on this world, it will seem only a tiny grain of sand in a whole new ocean.

We don’t have the words, but we soon will. The question is, will we still need them, words, that is?

The only ultimate power there really is…

What would it feel like to be telepathic in a room full of fools?

What would it feel like to be telepathic in a room full of psychopaths? Or maybe just a few?

What does is feel like to walk into a bar of drunk ppl stone cold sober and stay that way?

What does it feel like to have all your teenagers and their friends together for a sleepover and you are the responsible adult?

What if that room that everybody’s stuck in is a virtual room?

When you are listening to a pod cast, a show host, you know how there is always something in the voice that conveys way more than just what is being said – like you can sus out how they are physically and emotionally?

Take that once more removed and use only words to do the sussing. Now that we have twitter and chat rooms attached to videos and pod casts, we have a community of people that come together with their minds in a virtual room on one topic. We create a virtual meeting space that exists for the time of the event, however, sometimes this virtual room/meeting space continues for some time afterwards. We have all learned to convey our thoughts and feelings pretty succinctly in words/type/print over the last few years since this phenomena began and this makes the experience even more cohesive. Now imagine that this type of communication is very like telepathy, in that we don’t have to all be in the same place physically and we are all communicating all sorts of ideas to each other along with our feelings.

Then bring in this idea we have discussed about people feeling way more brazen about saying over the internet things that go way beyond the pale into rudeness and downright idiocy – all because the person they are saying it to is not standing in front of them ready to punch their lights out. Factor in that the respective emotional age of those people is between 5 years and 8 years old. Then factor in the reasons people stir the pot – for attention etc.… and you have a perfect recipe for kindergarten behavior and the need for naps and cookies. (throw in some thumb sucking and a soft blankie or two – you get the picture) and don’t forget, kindergartners don’t deal very well with grey areas – they want things like; yes – no, black-white, belief or hate ad nauseum. Their tolerance for indiscriminate, open ended ideas and constructive questioning and debate is zero. If you give them the fantasy they will believe it until an authority figure tells them, like mom or dad, that Santa Clause isn’t real. Metaphor is NOT one of their strong points.

Now place all of this into the category of real telepathy, where by rule of polite conduct you don’t barge in on others unless you follow those rules and imagine the above. Imagine what a head ache those who refuse to follow even a polite ethic in virtual reality would be in a real reality where there was organic telepathy, and you will know WHY organic telepathy is not a planet-wide ability like breathing or seeing… yet. (or imagine being in that bar fully sober and be glad you can walk out at any time…)

It has been said often that the internet is practice for if-and-when real telepathy becomes a fact. I KNOW there are those of us out there who would fling themselves off the planet just to get away from the zoo that would be. But if telepathy is a quantum entangled state (lol) it wouldn’t matter how far you went, you would still be in the middle of it – if you chose to listen. If you chose to notice…

I’m almost sorry I dipped my big toe into this mess yesterday, except in struggling to understand the why it all happened, I’ve learned a lesson. I hate suffering. I don’t care if some people think it’s the only way we grow. I still hate it. I hate pain, causing it or having it. Yes, sometimes we have to have it to learn or to alter our behavior maybe to save our lives. I still hate it. And…I would do–no-harm if I could help it. And sometimes I can’t. And yet, in cases like the falderal that has been going on, it also has to be sorted. Sorted for understanding, sorted to stop the damage, sorted to learn from it, sorted for prevention…sorted. And to those who have done the sorting and to those who got caught in the falderal, I salute you. You have my sympathy and admiration for your courage.

Pathology is always hard to understand and assess fast enough to catch it before destruction happens because most people are nice and because they are the unsuspecting victims of bad behavior. Once again we have pain on both sides because the perp’s bad behavior is born from the roots of pain and the unsuspecting are not ready for what is coming at them. There are consequences for both. The perp is found out and must be accountable for the action, the victim learns not to be so innocent in a world that will crush that light out of them.

And once again we are faced with choice. Choice before action, choice before thought, choice before emotional response. Choice comes out of an ethic and empathy. You are an adult because you can choose at a creative, ethical level. Children cannot – they want absolutes. Those who can choose have a gift in the awareness of that choice.

Because, choice is the only ultimate power there really is.

And there is always a choice to be found in everything.

And for some strange reason this little planet seems to be where you go to learn it.

 

Consciousness IS the unified field: or Don’t Worry, Be Happy

…it’s not about neg. or pos. or happy or sad, it’s about the inevitable march forward of our conscious awareness…

-ABell

I would love to see science prove what we know in our inner heart. However, the schizophrenic split between science and consciousness – the world of the seen and unseen, has been weaponized. And of course, it’s on purpose. But we have a defense…

Once again, I was listening to the recent interview dropped by Natasha Nyxx with Grant Cameron. Grant seems to be the only person willing to be open about the real truth at the moment. Everybody else will tell you a tid bit – but that is all – whether they know the whole story or just tid bits… I listen a lot, to an eclectic selection all with one theme, that of the consciousness thread running through it. From Richard Dolan and Joseph Farrell, to the Dean Radins of the world, through Gordon White. I have blogged about the necessity for cross disciplinary studies from the quantum super position to psychology, parapsychology and religious perspectives. Everybody has their own ‘name’ for these things but they are talking about the same thing. Why? Because it really is the same thing.

The visible-invisible split has been used to cage the human experience. I have written about the biggest psy-op in the world and this is it. Our minds have been messed with – really badly messed with. We have been taught to use only one part of our wholeness. We are schizophrenic.

Otherwise, were we to know our wholeness our unity, we would realize this world and ourselves much differently. But, we have a defense. There is something called the hundredth monkey effect, the morphogenic resonance. It doesn’t just happen with monkeys on an island. I watched this happen back in the 60’s much to my dismay over gemstones. Back in the day there was a place in the ‘burbs of Chicago, called the Lizzadro Museum of Lapidary art. It was in my neighborhood and mom and I and my sis used to go there just to look at their amazing displays. They had a gift shop where you could buy polished, faceted stones which every time we went – we got to buy some. They were cheap. I still have several pieces that I made back then that are lovely. I could afford them. Then enter Shirley MacLaine and the first main stream book ever written about a modern day awakening. She wrote about quartz crystals and the use of other gem stones to heighten states of consciousness and voila’! The price of quartz points quadrupled overnight. I was furious and felt cheated. I had bought them all my life – I was a rock hound, and suddenly I couldn’t afford to even look at them, much less purchase them.

Before Shirley MacLaine’s foray into consciousness raising, if you talked to anybody about auras, crystals, or meditation in mid-western Illinois, people thought you were crazy, FUBAR and gave you a wide berth plus the evil eye. Then in less than a year everything Shirley talked about was like, ‘Yeah, vibes, crystals, meditation, auras – I knew all about that’ and if you asked them how they learned it, to the last person they all said, ‘I just Know.’ like they woke up one day with it all inside their heads, while the few of us into this line of thinking had been struggling against the current for years.

That, my friends, is the hundredth monkey effect in the everyday people world.

Back in the seventies just try to tell a scientist or academic about information popping into the subconscious meta-culture of the people like magic and they would have simply sneered at you and sent you on your way. I know, I had it happen – lots. Bring it up today and you quite possibly would get a lecture on quantum super position… jus say’in.

So.

From my point of view, I see the world already in a great state of progress. The more of us forerunners that can understand and progress, the more this consciousness raising can happen. Day after day as the real-reality is apprehended and understood the raising of the whole is being done. We, the forerunners, who have been rolling that rock uphill against the wind on an icy slope are making this possible. I have seen this happen for the last forty years – once I understood the principle. All of a sudden a little new awareness creeps into the hearts and minds of the masses and becomes a claimed ‘I-always-knew-that’ fact. When you ask them how they knew that, they can’t pin point it – just that – well, now that I think about it, I always knew that…

This all relates back the Grant Cameron’s assertion that if you want to know about the answer to the UFO question, you have to understand consciousness. I have been saying for years that:

Consciousness IS the unified field.

What Grant says about downloads and contact modalities is correct too, from my point of view, because my first contact/download/telepathic experience was at 5 years old and brought on by extreme distress and yelling a question to god or whomever was out there and getting a full sensory/experiential answer that I remember 60 years later in total context. And it was all about love and unity, understanding and compassion. And I was only 5. It so profoundly changed my life, so totally colored my perspective that just about everything I did linked back to it. The experience simultaneously saved my life and my five year old heart and opened me to the rest of what came next in my life.

The lynch pin to the whole mess is Consciousness. Well, that and understanding that we already have a consciousness and part of that is connected to everything, everywhere, every time and yes, we still have to live it out here and share what we know to lovingly bring every other consciousness up in awareness and understanding that it is all – we are all inextricably connected, interwoven by this life force called consciousness.

It was a radio show, not a court of law….

I was listening to the Jimmy Church Radio Show last night with guest Richard Dolan. I followed Richard’s chat, and I was on twitter. During the commercial breaks I listened to Richard Dolan’s conversation with his chat.

Richard Dolan is an academic, an established debater, historian and knows the rules of proper conduct in a conversation/debate. He is also a very ethical man and will not overstep the guidelines for elucidation of an idea because he knows that it’s extremely unproductive.

For those who do not know:

Ten Simple Rules For Debating

Posted by Nullus Maximus

A significant amount of my recent work has been written in response to arguments made by other libertarian thinkers. As such, the time is ripe for a guide to how this is best done. This article will take the reader through the process of an exchange of ideas from start to finish, and explain my ten simple rules for debating. Those who follow these rules are guaranteed to become more successful debaters, as well as less stressed and overworked.

  1. Pick your battles. While a person of little renown may have enough time to engage with whomever one pleases at whatever length one desires, people who have less time to spend engaging in debates must choose which opponents to engage and which to ignore, as well as how long to engage each opponent. It is best to have a consistent rubric for this, which will be discussed further in rules 2 and 9.
  2. Engage only those worthy of being engaged. Some people are capable of maintaining a rational discourse, while other people cannot seem to communicate without resorting to personal attacks, profanity, threats, and other such uncivil behavior. Some people have interesting and novel insights, while other people insist upon bringing up points which have been refuted a thousand times. Some people are experts in the fields of which they speak, while other people do not stick to their lasts. Some people make the effort to properly support an argument, while other people Gish gallop. A person’s behavior in this regard is a strong indicator of whether that person is worthy of one’s attention. Note that other debaters will judge you by a similar standard, so be the kind of person that someone else would be willing to debate.
  3. Do your research. If you know a topic in great detail, you will be more able to counter any argument your opponent may make. An uninformed debater is an incompetent debater. An unprepared debater is a sloppy debater. Also, make sure that the sources you study are reliable. If the opponent is competent, a misinformed debater will be an embarrassed debater.
  4. Do not argue to convince the opponent; argue to convince a third party. In many cases, a person worthy of being engaged will be firmly entrenched in a position, and it may even be against the nature of the format for your opponent to come over to your side. Focus instead on convincing the audience, whether they be people watching a live debate or reading a correspondence. This methodology is stated explicitly in some debate formats, but it is sound strategy regardless.
  5. Base your arguments upon logic (logos), not emotion (pathos) or authority (ethos). A debate is properly won by using reason and evidence to demonstrate that one’s position is superior to that of one’s opponent. Detouring into appeals to emotion can help one connect with the audience or provoke an opponent into a misstep, but this does not advance one’s case in a rigorous manner. Appealing to the authority of oneself or someone else can dissuade a weak opponent or convince a less intelligent audience, but attempting this against a strong opponent in front of a knowledgeable audience is a recipe for disaster.
  6. Relentlessly attack logical fallacies and weak arguments. It is important to point out every shortcoming that you can find in your opponent’s case. Doing so will make you more skilled in identifying logical fallacies and weak arguments, which means that opponents will be less able to get away with sloppy reasoning in future debates. Do not worry about being pedantic; your job is to find all weaknesses in your opponent’s case and illuminate them to make your case appear stronger by comparison.
  7. Focus on the task at hand. A debate can easily go off track, especially if the subject matter is wide, deep, or both. Avoid making arguments that neither support your case nor attack your opponent’s case. Only go into the weeds if your opponent takes you there; the person who begins the foray into many different minutiae is usually running out of solid logic and evidence.
  8. Destroy arguments, not people. Be respectful of your opponent, or at least be as respectful of your opponent as he or she is of you. Resorting to personal attacks (or escalating them if they are already in use) is a refuge of a person with weak arguments, and it will make people less willing to consider your case on its merits. Remember, your job is to defeat your opponent’s arguments, not his or her character.
  9. Know when to quit. There comes a point in every debate at which further discussion has diminishing returns or even becomes completely pointless. It is important to learn to identify that point and stop there. Sometimes this will be clear; an opponent may even announce that a particular round will be his or her closing argument. If this happens, respond with a closing argument of your own and be finished; do not repeatedly pummel the opponent after he or she has left the debate. This may also be the case in a timed or response-limited debate, in which case one should abide by the rules of the format. In other cases, it will be a matter of personal judgment to decide to walk away from a debate.
  10. Handle both defeat and victory appropriately. No one likes a sore loser or a bad winner. If you lose a debate, reflect on how and why you lost. Then, take the necessary steps to avoid losing in the same manner in a future debate. This may involve more study of the debate topic, reviewing logical fallacies, or even changing one’s position on an issue. If you win, do not gloat or boast. Accept victory graciously, then check your discourse for arguments that could have been stronger or presented more effectively. From <https://www.zerothposition.com/2016/04/21/ten-simple-rules-for-debating/>   (Italic emphasis mine)

Jimmy Church is a radio host. What we were listening to last night was a radio show. Not a court of law. Jimmy has said this many times on his show, he will interview anybody. He will give them as much rope as they want. His job is to make the guest comfortable and elicit the conversation, while asking the questions that everybody wants answers to, and that is a gift he brings to the show. It is not, nor has it ever been, nor can I conceive that it ever will be a court of law or a place where emotional bashing will ever be allowed to occur! I have heard him politely hang up on people who try to take the conversation there. Those are his ethics. He will not step beyond them, just as Richard Dolan will not.

What just makes my jaw drop is the preponderance of loud noise people can make when they do not know about critical thinking or debate. The loudest voice never wins, nor does the meanest. Period. There was so much verbal battery going on in the comments last night that I was floored. What has happened to everybody’s minds???

It was not the purpose of either person speaking to provide evidence of any kind. This wasn’t even a debate, it was a conversation. It certainly wasn’t a court of law…

In a court of law:

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof

In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.

The Burden of Proof

The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.

The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.

Evidentiary Standards in Civil Cases

Preponderance of the Evidence

Second, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of persuasion. This burden determines which standard of proof the plaintiff must follow in presenting evidence to the judge or jury. A standard of proof determines the amount of evidence the plaintiff or defendant needs to provide in order for the jury to reach a particular determination. In most civil cases, the burden of persuasion that applies is called “a preponderance of the evidence.” This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor of the plaintiff if the plaintiff is able to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome.

Clear and Convincing Evidence

In some civil cases, the burden of proof is elevated to a higher standard called “clear and convincing evidence.” This burden of proof requires the plaintiff to prove that a particular fact is substantially more likely than not to be true. Some courts have described this standard as requiring the plaintiff to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true. This standard sets a higher threshold than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but it does not quite rise to the widely recognized standard used in criminal cases, known as “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Substantial Evidence

In administrative law proceedings, the standard of proof that most commonly applies is the substantial evidence standard. This standard requires the plaintiff or moving party to provide enough evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a particular conclusion.

Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Cases

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is the highest standard of proof that may be imposed upon a party at trial, and it is usually the standard used in criminal cases. This standard requires the prosecution to show that the only logical explanation that can be derived from the facts is that the defendant committed the alleged crime, and that no other logical explanation can be inferred or deduced from the evidence. The United States Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), described this standard as “such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof . . . . What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”

Credible Evidence

Another common standard of proof used in some criminal law proceedings is the credible evidence standard. Credible evidence is evidence that is not necessarily true but that is worthy of belief and worthy of the jury’s consideration. Some have defined this standard as requiring the jury to conclude that the evidence is natural, reasonable, and probable in order for it to be credible.

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof Resources

Overview

Articles Web Resources Laws Glossary Law Blogs Lawyers & Attorneys

From <https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/evidentiary-standards-burdens-proof/>

 

Further, IMO (here it comes) when evidentiary standards and burden of proof are applied to the UFO question, we do not even know the scope of the situation. For instance, there is a preponderance of opinion out there that consciousness needs to added into the equation to properly understand what a reasonable question could/should be. From a quantum physics aspect looking at consciousness, this makes sense because of the ‘observer effect’ and entanglement. From an experiencer aspect it appears to be the whole of the experience from the preponderance of the data.

BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (VOLUME ONE)

by REINERIO HERNANDEZ (Author), RUDY SCHILD (Author), JON KLIMO (Author)

This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)– The FREE Experiencer Research Study.

Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of “Experiencers” contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology.

Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that “Consciousness” and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of “nuts & bolt’s” Ufology.

The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From  <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07G3JLS3H/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1>

 

And this doesn’t even scratch the surface of what needs to be added to the equation or quantified and debated. And yet – we descend into gossip and snarky attitudes over one little tiny insignificant piece of the puzzle and deem ourselves capable of not only presenting all the facts, but arguing them in a legal manner. This field is not about just one tiny little question, nor one tiny little person (or several) people. It is about the whole planet!

 

Wake up! Put your head on the right way and act like it’s not empty in there!!!!!   grrrrrrrrrrr

 

 

 

 

 

Of Cages

The fights we are seeing going on right now echo two things in my mind, well maybe three.
1. the dark magic is reminiscent of the Jack Parsons/Crowley/Hubbard stuff from the 1940’s repeating and the magical alchemy of money BMMS (lol – Babylonian Money Magic System) (2)

2. the ‘two groups fighting resemble the light and the dark brotherhoods of the mystery schools (who believe it or not folks are being controlled by this larger force such that they are both too busy to see that third force)

3. this all kinda goes back to the survivors of the great cosmic war when they blew up a planet, wound up here and have never stopped creating MESS. (of which number two is only the latest iteration)

The cult mentality of all of it is even more concerning. Information on cults:

Humans desire comfort, and in a fearful and uncertain world many turn to cults because they tend to promote exactly that. Jon-Patrik Pedersen, a psychologist at CalTech, has pointed out that cult leaders often make promises that are totally unattainable, but also offered by no other group in society. Such things might include financial security, total health, constant peace of mind, and eternal life — the things every human desires at the deepest level. (savior mentality)

Cults satisfy the human desire for absolute answers.

Those with low self-esteem are more likely to be persuaded by a cult environment.

New recruits are “love bombed.”

Women are more likely than men to join a cult.

Many cult members have rejected religion.

Cults maintain their power by promoting an “us vs. them” mentality.

Cult leaders are masters at mind control.

Ways in which leaders gain control over cult members vary, but some popular methods include:

Public Humiliation: New cult members may be “love bombed” shortly after their arrival, but once they are established members, cult leaders often maintain emotional control through various exercises meant to publicly humiliate a member. One such method involves someone sitting in a chair surrounded by other members, at which time they are required to admit their recent failures, base thoughts, shortcomings, etc.

Self-Incrimination: A favorite tactic of the infamous cult leader Jim Jones, self-incrimination requires cult members to provide their leader with written statements detailing their individual fears and mistakes. The cult leader can then use these statements to shame individual members publicly.

Brainwashing: Cult leaders are known to repeat various lies and distortions until members find it difficult to distinguish between reality and cult life.

Paranoia: To maintain a false sense of comfort, cults often rely on paranoia tactics. Cult leaders convince their victims that a group, their families, and/or the government is out to get them, but that the cult can provide safety. Once a cult member comes to the conclusion that their families and country cannot keep them safe, they begin to worship and put all of their faith in their cult leader. Jim Jones was especially skilled at this mind-control trick. He would encourage members to spy on each other, and consistently spoke through loudspeakers at all hours of the day so that cult members would hear his voice whether awake or asleep.

Cult members often have no idea they’re in a cult.

Cult life can have a dangerous and lasting effect.

He specifically mentions that the “symptoms of temporal lobe epilepsy are similar to those seen or reported as resulted from cult conversions:

increased irritability

loss of libido or altered sexual interest

ritualism

compulsive attention to detail

mystical states

humorlessness and sobriety

heightened paranoia

From <https://www.onlinepsychologydegree.info/what-to-know-about-the-psychology-of-cults/>

In case you choose to say, ‘Not Me’…

Before jumping into the specifics, I’d like to briefly discuss an insidious psychological process called the “Self-serving Bias.” This bias leads us to believe that we are immune to the influences that affect the rest of humanity. I run into this bias all the time when describing my work on resistance to persuasion: “I think it’s great that you’re trying to help people resist television ads. Of course, TV ads don’t persuade me…”

The self-serving bias has been demonstrated countless times: the majority of Americans believe they are smarter and better looking than average; most drivers (even those hospitalized for accidents) believe themselves more skilled than the average driver; most smog-breathing Los Angelinos believe themselves healthier than their neighbors; most college students believe they will outlive their predicted age of death by 10 years, and so on.

The most ironic example of the self-serving bias that I’ve ever heard appeared in a social psychology paper written by one of Kelton’s students. After the self-serving bias had been discussed in class, this student wrote:

“I don’t understand why they say the self-serving bias is universal. I mean, I see it in other people, but I personally don’t have a self-serving bias.”

I’m not kidding, the student really wrote that!

From <http://www.workingpsychology.com/cultdef.html>
What do you do with information you want to have hidden and keep hidden? You swear those who know to secrecy with ideas like the destruction of mankind because mankind cannot handle the power and importance of this information and you hide it behind mystery schools. (1) This causes the information to land in two select groups. One that will have a moral and ethical bent towards the greatest good, and one that will keep and use the information for their own advancement (breakaways and ppl like those who run CERN and HARRP)
IMO we are looking at a worldwide psy-op (cult) that nobody really knows the full extent of, with even the mystery schools, prominent and excellent researchers, governments and alphabet soups and all the others being played as useful-idiots.

We are all being played.

When the

‘…only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.’

is the only thing we can be sure of, then the world is operating as one giant cult.
And instead of recognizing this most people are acting like captives in a cage scrambling for the biggest scraps that land through the bars, while diligent souls who have real information are drowned out by insignificant and useful idiots such that the mass confusion creates its own control system. Problem solved for the cage tenders.
OMG!!!
(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m2Qvh85QBY&list=PLNfJkzByQRux01gvudalzEGUgoH496qay

(2) https://youtu.be/r3-wlD8LOM4BMMS

With Egg on my Face

I sit before this electronic piece of equipment that is my doorway to the greater world, with egg on my face….

Meaning : ‘To have/caught with egg on your face‘ means to be made to look foolish or to be embarrassed. Origin: “Random House Dictionary of American Slang, Vol. 1, A-G” by J.E. Lighter (Random House, New York, 1994): “have egg on (one’s) face — to look foolish or be embarrassed. https://www.quora.com/What-does-caught-with-egg-on-your-face-mean-and-what-is-its-…

It’s an old idiom, so there’s what it means. Yep, I’m embarrassed for several reasons. One, because I unwittingly let myself get caught in the ongoing hooha I was disparaging in my oh so acerbic opines, and two because the more I felt around inside about this issue, the more I understood it as a lesson in being kind, and collecting all the data I could before I did opine and make an ass of myself. Literally. Lastly, it was a kick in my morally oh so righteous ass that askes ‘Since when did you walk a mile in their shoes?’

So, I’m gonna dust myself off, get up, try again with maybe a little more empathy in my heart aaaand, opine again. This kind of character bashing used to be called slander and defamation of character and back before the internet when we used to have to print stuff like this on paper to make a point, could get you thrown in jail for it. It is one thing to report a verified fact, and another just to give your opinions.

I am guilty of having a bad attitude, justifiable or not to pin it on anyone else as their fault is really immature. I’m 65 – I should know better. Really. I am guilty of listening to others without doing the research – which in this case would have saved my sorry ass from looking like a sorry ass – and forming an opinion on yet another opinion. Just shoot me now. (I suppose this stems from being angry at others for doing it and thusly having the karmic pleasure of doing it myself so I could understand why… ahem)

Here’s the thing. We all complain about what a mess this field is from the half-truths linked to the truth, from the outright dis-information to the lies being almost indistinguishable from the truth.

true /tro͞o/

in accordance with fact or reality.

rightly or strictly so called; genuine.

said when conceding a point in argument or discussion.
accurate or exact.

(interestingly this was an old German word for truce )

We all know about the ‘Truth Embargo’, we all know we have been lied to officially.

So really the only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.

So you see, how all of us can get testy. Just a bit… the whole game has been crafted so well, and is so insidious, that we are all ( I was going to say a bit, but this qualifies for full frontal) paranoid.

For What It Is Worth

Buffalo Springfield

There’s something happening here

What it is ain’t exactly clear

There’s a man with a gun over there

Telling me I got to beware

I think it’s time we stop, children, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

There’s battle lines being drawn

Nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong

Young people speaking their minds

Getting so much resistance from behind

It’s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

What a field-day for the heat

A thousand people in the street

Singing songs and carrying signs

Mostly say, hooray for our side

It’s s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Paranoia strikes deep

Into your life it will creep

It starts when you’re always afraid

You step out of line, the man come and take you away

We better stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, now, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, children, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Songwriters: Stephen Stills

For What It Is Worth lyrics © Warner/Chappell Music, Inc

So here we are. In the mist of another revolution, one not so fun as the sixties and way more important. What are we going to do about it? How are we going to handle it? What kind of example will we set for those who will see this as it transforms the world we live in. We need to get better at this. We really do.

I really do.

‘Two wrongs do not make a right’: Addendum to ‘Heads are gonna roll’

…they simply can’t see what is happening to them because of the unpierced veils blocking their view.

– Niara Terela Isley

This was an extremely thoughtful reply under my article ‘Heads are gonna Roll’ on Onstellar.com. Aman brings up very valid points and IMO the points are needful of consideration. I include this reply here because it was written on an open forum with the ability to be read by anyone and I think his essay should be read.

@AmanOnerth

This is a great article and inevitably there will be turmoil as reality unfolds and atrocities uncovered. However…..what do we think is going on in the minds of the human beings locked into the mechanisms of the oligarchy? If we subscribe to a culture of righteous indignation, vengeance masquerading as justice, the settling of scores….this is actually part of the problem imho. Because why is it do you think these technologies have been suppressed? Power, right? But think about it. After generations of the oppression and exploitation of the southern hemisphere, generations of inequality and brutal dehumanization, generations of watching the developed world benefit and live in relative luxury from the poverty and political manipulation of over half the world’s population, what happens when technologies and spiritual truths that level the field and alter the balance of power become commonplace? Unity consciousness? One big happy human family and all the sins forgiven? Or would some nations, some people within them at least, be keen on settling scores and getting their revenge? As for the super elites (and please be assured I am no fan of their actions or their motives) and their multitudinous crimes and deliberate suppression and manipulation of the masses. If the global cultural environment is one of needing and wanting “heads to roll” (whether a metaphor or a literal meaning is intended) then what possible motive could they have for doing anything but digging into their ivory towers and preparing for the worst? Surely, if we want and need the truth to be revealed, crimes to be confessed and a new age of unity consciousness to be realized, then we need to cultivate an environment and global culture of leniency, forgiveness and amnesty? Now I am not saying people shouldn’t answer for their crimes if they confess and say sorry. Amends should be made and some form of recompense secured. But if we are hoping for, and rubbing our hands in anticipation of, the suffering and humiliation of these people then how can we expect them to do otherwise than reinforce their position and adopt a strong defensive posture? For true disclosure (in all of its contexts), full transparency and a new age of global trust and honesty to occur, we need surely to create an environment whereby people feel safe to step out of the shadows and admit their wrongdoings?

If stepping out and confessing your sins meant walking into a crowd of angry people with their burning torches and pitchforks intent on seeing you suffer for their pain then what would you do? From <https://onstellar.com/posts/104477>

‘Heads are gonna roll’ is a metaphor… something my dad used to say when he knew there was going to be trouble. You are totally correct. People are going to be…upset. It is one of the reasons there is the slow drip disclosure crowd out there.

Personally, I wish for disclosure so I can go on about my life, maybe have the time to discover my life. But, there are people who are very directly involved in this with huge hurt in their lives all over the planet. More than revenge they will need healing. More than trials and punishments we will need new structure and processes. We will need a new way to think about who and what we are.

However you look at it, this will be messy. We have to dismantle the systems of an entire planet, and craft a new vision for this earth. Without this… Humanity knows nothing else so, how would we be, who would we be if it was different? After what we have been through, how do we restructure?

There will be a mess and many will want a savior… which if we are going to grow up as a species, we simply cannot have. It’s going to get messy for a while. Thus my colloquialism that ‘heads were gonna roll’.

I suppose I could have said it differently, but as you can see, that mind set at this time predominates. At the core, we are all tired, hurting and ready to change. We will have our own hearts to question and look deeply into to find a way to get over this mess. Which, brings up another colloquialism from my mom: Two wrongs do not make a right… From <https://onstellar.com/posts/104477>

I am currently reading Niara Terela Isley’s book, “Facing the Shadow, Embracing the Light: A journey of spirit retrieval and awakening”. She gives a model of what deep healing looks like and the courage it takes to actually do the work and not just pay ‘lip service’ to it. This quote could be actually true, as I know from experience in my own life.

…if quantum fields build the reality we see around us from what we hold in our own consciousness – subconscious-unconscious, super-higher consciousness included – then shadow factions within governments and corporate power structures of this world are very likely our own creation within our whole collective human consciousness. Our reality becomes an outer observance of compartmentalization within government, military and corporate structures, that “need-to-know” basis which so frustrates those of us trying to get to the truth, generating activist movements for disclosure about the UFO and ET phenomenon. The realms of shadow governments, black projects, covert-ops and all the horrible things done under their control more than qualifies as the subconscious/unconscious Freudian Id of the human collective. True to this Freudian model, most of humanity has denied a shadow government existence for a very long time, not wanting to confront the reality – or the fear – of being visited by beings from other worlds or other dimensions. The majority of humanity has not at all wanted to crack open the mind’s door to peer into the horrors of intentionally inflicted trauma and mind-control abuses. Or to look at the fact that society as a whole has been subject to subtler forms of mind control as well.

Isley, Niara Terela. Facing the Shadow, Embracing the Light: A Journey of Spirit Retrieval and Awakening (Kindle Locations 4501-4510). Niara Terela Isley. Kindle Edition.

This is going to be a difficult problem to solve because of levels of awareness in societal structure – granted they have been created on purpose just so that the herculean task in front of us would be very difficult to complete.

…they simply can’t see what is happening to them because of the unpierced veils blocking their view.

Behind the first veil: There are over six billion people on the planet. Most of them live and die without having seriously contemplated anything other than what it takes to keep their lives together. Ninety percent of all humanity will live and die without having pierced the first veil.

The first veil: Ten percent of us will pierce the first veil and find the world of politics. We will vote, be active and have an opinion. Our opinions are shaped by the physical world around us. We have a tendency to accept that government officials, network media personalities and other “experts” are voices of authority. Ninety percent of the people in this group will live and die without having pierced the second veil.

The second veil: Ten percent of us will pierce the second veil to explore the world of history, the relationship between man and government and the meaning of self-government through constitutional and common law. Ninety percent of the people in this group will live and die without having pierced the third veil.

The third veil: Ten percent of us will pierce the third veil to find that the resources of the world, including people, are controlled by extremely wealthy and powerful families whose incorporated old world assets have, with modern extortion strategies, become the foundation upon which the world’s economy is currently indebted. Ninety percent of the people in this group will live and die without having pierced the fourth veil.

The fourth veil: Ten percent of us will pierce the fourth veil to discover the Illuminati, Freemasonry and the other secret societies. These societies use symbols and perform ceremonies that perpetuate the generational transfers of arcane knowledge that is used to keep the ordinary people in political, economic and spiritual bondage to the oldest bloodlines on earth. Ninety percent of the people in this group will live and die without having pierced the fifth veil.

The fifth veil: Ten percent of us will pierce the fifth veil to learn that the secret societies are so far advanced technologically that time travel and interstellar communications have no boundaries and controlling the actions of people is what their members do as offhandedly as we tell our children when they must go to bed. Ninety percent of the people in this group will live and die without having pierced the sixth veil.

The sixth veil: Ten percent of us will pierce the sixth veil where the dragons and lizards and aliens we thought were the fictional monsters of childhood literature are real and are the controlling forces behind the secret societies. Ninety percent of the people in this group will live and die without piercing the seventh veil.

The seventh veil: I do not know what is behind the seventh veil. I think it is where your soul is evolved to the point you can exist on earth and be the man Ghandi was, or the woman Peace Pilgrim was – people so enlightened they brighten the world around them no matter what.

The eighth veil? Piercing the eighth veil probably reveals God and the pure energy that is the life force in all living things – which are, I think, one and the same.

Those who are stuck behind veils one through five have little choice but to view the people who have pierced the veils beyond them as insane. With each veil pierced, exponentially shrinking numbers of increasingly enlightened people are deemed insane by exponentially increasing masses of decreasingly enlightened people. Adding to the irony, the harder a “sixth or better veiler” tries to explain what he is able to see to those who can’t, the more insane he appears to them.

Isley, Niara Terela. Facing the Shadow, Embracing the Light: A Journey of Spirit Retrieval and Awakening (Kindle Locations 5133-5137). Niara Terela Isley. Kindle Edition.

So you see, not in my words, but hers and people like Richard Dolan and many others, the problem is known, the solution, however is the 65 trillion dollar question. The education of so many, so deeply indoctrinated into life ‘as they see fit’ may take generations to change.

And we have only just scratched the surface….

My 2 cents: Heads are gonna roll.

You didn’t think that once UFO’s became real household talking points that it was going to be all rainbows and unicorn farts, did you? Of course the military – who knows their time is limited, is going to push their spin of “T-H-R-E-A-T” because if they didn’t, one of the biggest industries in the country would fall. I mean, who needs them once there is no more threat from anywhere?

And when the full implications, all the spin offs from this technology become widely known, all the rest of the bricks of the false paradigm will fall too. Heads will roll. It will be an entirely new world, if we can take it. With entirely NEW industry, so there is money to be made – just not by them…   Ahem

That includes the oil industry: when we have anti-gravity – that means the research on the ‘meta-materials’ (which we have known how to build since WW2) will be drawn out for ever, until some kid discovers how to do it in his garage..

That means that the power companies will continue to destroy the earth for coal and oil – even though a clean power source has existed since WW2 – think Tessla – when we completed the ARV’s. Which is also the study of harmonic frequencies used by interferometry, radar tech, cell phone tech. and HAARP & Assoc. Notice the only piece of that we get is the cell phone stuff and why? Because it can be weaponized (think 5G) against us. Why? Because when this comes out, heads will roll.

That means that the sound/light/frequency healing techniques will take forever to come out too because to do that would lead right into the fact that we have not only a power source but a way to focus and tune a projected beam to the absolute perfect frequencies of choice without overtones or any other interference. And it will absolutely kiss Big Pharma good bye. Imagine the millions who have lost a loved one to cancer and their anger when they realize it didn’t have to happen that way? Heads will roll.

The whole kit and caboodle will be delayed so everybody can get their money and spend it before money becomes useless. Before their heads do roll. But lots of money is really addictive, so once you gets lots, you can’t stop – like cocaine – even when it tears up everything in your world and leaves behind shambles. So that game will keep going at any expense – they care not. Those heads will roll too.

The lynch pin is to keep us sure of the fact that they DON’T know if these craft and people are friendly or not. So they are pushing the ‘Threat’ word in the congress and senate to gain yet more money to buy more control on a defunct idea that met its death in the 50’s – that we are at desperate risk. Which, as has been said by the best of them, “If they wanted to take us out we’d never even realize we were gone.” They have always had the power to do that. We are still painfully here slogging through the mess.

This current game going on between several factions on earth about how much we know or don’t know, whether we have the science or don’t have the science or whether they do and we don’t, is all a sham. A time waster. A desperate attempt by desperate people to maintain power and parasitic control of us for as long as they can. Heads will roll.

The fight has gone so far that our space junk is breaking down – telescopes are glitching, mars junk is breaking, the rockets are exploding… now they want us to think all of it was a just big bad game.

The handwriting is on the wall. Inevitability, the tipping point has been reached.

It’s over.

Heads are gonna roll.

etc.   (https://www.youtube.com/feed/history)

(don’t I sound old, over it and mean though….wow)

 

In+car+nate + Re = again and again, and again…

In

used as a function word to indicate inclusion, location, or position within limits

carn

carō f (genitive carnis); third declension

flesh, meat  pulp of a fruit  body

*karō f proto-italic: piece, portion (cut off)  meat

nate

Etymology

From older gnātus, from Proto-Italic *gnātos, from Proto-Indo-European *ǵn̥h₁tós (“produced, given birth”), from *ǵenh₁– (“to produce, give birth, beget”).

Perfect active participle of nāscor (“I am born”).

nātus m (feminine nāta, neuter nātum); first/second declension:  born, arisen, made

Incarnation –

late Middle English: from ecclesiastical Latin incarnat- ‘made flesh,’ from the verb incarnare, from in- ‘into’ + caro, carn- ‘flesh.’

Incarnation literally means embodied in flesh or taking on flesh. It refers to the conception and birth of a sentient being who is the material manifestation of an entity, god or force whose original nature is immaterial. In its religious context the word is used to mean the descent from Heaven of a god, deity, or divine being in human/animal form on Earth.  From <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarnation>

Add ‘Re’ in front of it and it means again…

What if this planet makes really good avatar bodies? What if the purpose of all of the taking of the DNA is to make an avatar body to experience this place for ET races who want a more inclusive experience – a body with perceptive abilities? I mean, if you wanted to know how perceived pain in a body would translate into an ethic or moral, or societal principle/imperative and thus grow empathy/understanding/unity consciousness in a being, wouldn’t you need to have a means to understand the process????

Some of the above pieces of words have proto (before) Roman/Latin etymology tracings to the Greek language about 1,000 years earlier – leaving out the far earlier Egyptian/Sumerian history (which I know hardly anything about but rest assured they talked about reincarnation then too). Etymology meaning as far back as the word can be traced in history. In other words, they’ve been talking about reincarnation, since before time began.

One wonders that if at one time, eons ago, you knew you were just inhabiting a ‘meat-suit’ of sorts, but as the evolving technology to create an avatar got better over the eons that recognition of spirit was lost as the game became deadly serious? The lesson would definitely become a thousand times more real and teachable if you didn’t know or remember who you really were.

Seeing as how there are fractal shards of your oversoul in every density and dimension simultaneously, and yet very little ability of the one pointed concentration of the shard here on this world is able to access the rest of its being with any ease, might it be the case that this focus in the 3D is exactly what is required to learn empathy through pain?

Density as a scale goes up and down. Dimensions go side to side. This creates a lattice that creates our picture of the universe. (I just had to put a bit of metaphysics in this…)

“When you consider that human beings are the divider between matter and spirit – that we hold both and touch both through consciousness: it makes humanity a portal – doorway through which information is shared to either side of the equation or through the portal. Therefore, just about anything can be looked on as a portal – for in a way, a portal is that ‘idea’ of a crossing point from one state into another.”

Reality runs 10 to the 23rd power times per second. This would be like a very high RF energy wave running into the potential points in the quantum hologram and producing a ‘snap shot’ or collapsing the wave into a particle which IS our reality/snapshot and it all happens so fast that we don’t notice when we are a non-materialized wave.

These quantum points of potential that make up the hologram are information. The wave form is consciousness…

Reality is therefore a condition of energy/consciousness bumping into, or connecting with the hologram (which is a wave guide)   and time is in reality just a blip every 10 to the 23rd time per second that they are touching. It is the movement through the hologram of the energy wave that creates space and time as it connects to the potentials of the hologram. This is how we ‘create’ our reality (and sort of why we are ‘stuck’ in the concept of linear time).

Were you to stop time – freeze the motion of the universe, you would see the lattice structure (very similar to the structure of a crystal) of the physical medium – the zero point field, essentially it’s wave guide. Everything that has matter exists as a part of, or in this field. The very fact that we are consciousness, intelligent awareness is what is attracting and cohering the matter that makes the physical bodies that we inhabit. This is the same for any manifested shape in the physical realm, which presupposes intelligent awareness of one kind or another of everything we can see and touch and some that we can’t.  https://alsionsbells.wordpress.com/2018/07/12/on-dna-glinda-balls-and-reality-antennas/

Our ability to ‘notice’ new frequencies (at least to us in this now) both from overcoming programming and fear and sharing this information with each other through the internet has begun to open up our acceptance of these perceptions and it is beginning to snow ball into a worldwide phenomenon. We are all starting to accept that we have all had these experiences in one way or another. By sharing this information we are finding a greater ability that seems to open up like lights going on in a dim room because the sharing itself is an algorithmic function growing our knowing exponentially. We are really all of one mind and the more we become aware of that, the faster the information is shared, the faster we all wake up. This, IMO, is why there is such an effort to divide us on so many fronts in so many ways. This is why this information and the regularization (everybody knows it like they know they breath sort of thing) of it to its innateness has been demonized throughout history. I mean, if we all knew this on an innate (inborn) level, well, gracious me! there would be no exterior control of us, and none of the idiocy going on right now would be possible… IMO, of course.

The one theme I’m seeing over and over, not just in what is being reported but out in the regular world, is that things I used to have to spend hours explaining to my friends, just to talk about it with them, are now widely accepted and digested – we have reached a very important tipping point and it just whizzed by right under our noses.

A friend of mine keeps seeing himself and his life from other dimensions, like they are overlapping somehow. He said the other him is aware of this him and has even smiled at him and this is happening in a waking state. At work, almost clearly defined people are walking through his office through the walls going places – like his office space is superimposed over a mall in another dimension.

My kitchen is definitely lower than it is other dimensionally because I have been talking with people on skype who always see legs from the knees down walking by my kitchen window outside. This has happened with more than one person and more than once. I have been traversing sideways (dimensionally) since the 80’s. I will wake up and notice very subtle shifts in my life and it will feel slightly different and there is always that ‘oops’ feeling about it. I’ve learned not to worry because there is never any really great change, a lot of my dimensional lives must be extremely similar… I’m opinionated everywhere…LMAO, at least in the string of frequencies I’ve been visiting lately.

The point of all of this is that even though we all feel stuck in a very messy, mucky time right now where it seems like the world is gonna pop, it’s not. We are just expanding who and what we are to the horror of the elite (who have helped us greatly achieve this by being buttheads) and the great joy of many ‘others’ out there who have been waiting for us to shake off the eons of misapprehension about what life really is and come out and play with the big kids in the universe. We are fast approaching this juncture – even those of us who are considered the peanut gallery who supposedly know nothing.

We are beautiful souls walking around in a flesh and blood avatar. We, especially those of us who have for gotten that we are beautiful beings of light inside, have been privileged enough to learn very intimately what it means to possess true empathy and unity with the other both because of the body and in spite of the body. We know we are about at the end of this long arduous journey because our empathy is such that we now only need learn of, hear, or see another’s pain – interspecies or otherwise across all boundaries and we have the capacity to ‘feel for’ the other. It may have taken a few thousand incarnations and years, but, here we are. Our perceptive abilities have opened enough to include more than one density and multiple dimensions while awake and in the 3D mind. I suspect the speed of this transformation is almost totally dependent on how much we share it, that the more regular this can become, the better we will all be at it.

One day this earth will be a beautiful place to hang out.

 

Spin

I play this game when I want to understand how language hooks ideas together and to ferret out odd meanings of things. I call it Dictionary Chase. I start with a word look it up and find the next most interesting word in the definition of the first one and so on.

spin

verb

give (a news story or other information) a particular interpretation, especially a favorable one.

draw out (wool, cotton, or other material) and convert it into threads, either by hand or with machinery.

spin wool into the yarn for weaving

make (threads) by drawing out and twisting fibers.

a particular bias, interpretation, or point of view, intended to create a favorable (or sometimes, unfavorable) impression when presented to the public.

synonyms:

slant, angle, twist, bias

Origin

Old English spinnan ‘draw out and twist (fiber)’; related to German spinnen . The noun dates from the mid 19th century.

A yarn is a story and when you tell it you are weaving the story…

yarn

noun

noun: yarn; plural noun: yarns

spun thread used for knitting, weaving, or sewing.

informal
a long or rambling story, especially one that is implausible.

synonyms:

story, tale, anecdote, saga, narrative, tall tale, tall story, fish story, cock-and-bull story, shaggy-dog story, spiel

verb

informal

verb: yarn; 3rd person present: yarns; past tense: yarned; past participle: yarned; gerund or present participle: yarning

tell a long or implausible story.
“they were yarning about local legends and superstitions

Some stories can be very hard to believe…

implausible

im·plau·si·ble

imˈplôzəb(ə)l/

adjective

adjective: implausible

(of an argument or statement) not seeming reasonable or probable; failing to convince.
“this is a blatantly implausible claim”

synonyms:

unlikely, improbable, questionable, doubtful, debatable unrealistic, unconvincing, far-fetched, incredible, unbelievable, unimaginable, inconceivable, fantastic, fanciful, ridiculous, absurd, preposterous, impossible, hard to swallow, cock and bull

 

Which you, to make it a good and a plausible story, draw out your points (threads) and twist them to fit your ideas: you spin your threads…

spin

spin/

verb

give (a news story or other information) a particular interpretation, especially a favorable one.

draw out (wool, cotton, or other material) and convert it into threads, either by hand or with machinery.
“they spin wool into the yarn for weaving”

make (threads) by drawing out and twisting fibers.
“this method is used to spin filaments from syrups”

a particular bias, interpretation, or point of view, intended to create a favorable (or sometimes, unfavorable) impression when presented to the public.

synonyms:

slant, angle, twist, bias

Creating a bias – a slant, your slant – almost like a little white lie like you tell your parents to escape punishment…

bias

noun

noun: bias; plural noun: biases

prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.
“there was evidence of bias against foreign applicants”

a concentration on or interest in one particular area or subject.

synonyms:

prejudice, partiality, partisanship, favoritism, unfairness, one-sidedness; bigotry, intolerance, discrimination, leaning, tendency, inclination, predilection, caste-ism,

influence, color, sway, weight, predispose, distort, skew, slant

 

Statistics:

systematic distortion of a statistical result due to a factor not allowed for in its derivation.

Usually to make your point, create your point of view and to control the story and the people listening to it by creating a prejudice…

prejudice

plural noun: prejudices

preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.

synonyms:

preconceived idea, preconception, prejudgment, dislike, hostility, or unjust behavior deriving from unfounded opinions.

Which invariably creates actions towards the other viewpoints that are combative…

verb: prejudice

verb: prejudice; 3rd person present: prejudices; past tense: prejudiced; past participle: prejudiced; gerund or present participle: prejudicing

Law
cause harm to (a state of affairs).

synonyms:

damage, be detrimental to, be prejudicial to, injure, harm, hurt, spoil, impair, undermine, hinder, compromise

The point being to lock your head into ONLY one way of seeing, observing, understanding a topic for one reason and one reason only, CONTROL – of you.

This is the season of SPIN. It’s coming at you from every direction, 360 degrees, possible. Spin does not mean the information is incorrect, or wrong, it just means a little off from true, its slanted, partisan – toward one party or faction or another. The fact that it is being used to create a prejudice within us, however, to foment emotion and cement or change our loyalties needs to be noted. I am reminded of John Rappoport’ s article: The night the world recovered its sanity.   We are all totally free to choose one perspective over another – one bias over another, just as long as we have thought it through and don’t allow it to close off our minds to what might be found in the future to be a more complete understanding of the whole.

Keep the damned trap door open…..