Pay no attention to the…

So, aside from the beta testing of the 5G satellite web causing me to feel like I am wrapped in cotton, kinda like Wellbutrin did when I used it to try to quit smoking (didn’t work – Chantix) and being annoyed by that, I finally woke this morning after another fitful night of sleep (because I had to chase off a somebody/something last night) realizing what a GIANT web all of the proceedings of the last month have been. The 5G cage is severely limiting my energetic travels at night. I go somewhere deep and healing, on purpose and I can’t seem to stay there very long lately. I even saw the limiter field sort of like a horizonal bunch of wavy lines with the color and illumination of something close to candle light.

The incursion into the sanctuary of my bed room – which I have highly warded (protected by energy) by something smelling like farts (seriously) caused me to re-ward the house, my hubs, the dogs and myself twice before the frequency in the room was high enough to lock out the debris. Which is interesting because night before last the repeating theme was to discover the consciousness behind what I think consciousness is.  (phew) what a thought! In fact the whole theme of last month has been perception/deception and LOOK behind what you think is there!

Finally, when I woke today I realized what I was feeling was a fake bubble of reality that we are all living in. These are REAL issues, but they are being engineered all together for a purpose…

  • UFO’s are real and are a real threat – not to mention whomever is piloting them
  • COVID 19 is a weapon in a silent WW3 – is real and is being used as a fear bomb
  • Masks and Memes are being used to socially engineer the us into silent obedience
  • Civil Disobedience is being fostered by China and Soros with a pending invasion

ALL linked to each other, all provoked, all a distraction and about 50% real and 50% lies.

ALL PUT TOGETHER ARE A BIG, GRAND,

FALSE FLAG

It is now up to us to figure it out. We have a few events in the near future that could put an interesting spin on all of it like the election and what supposedly will be a 2nd wave of illness thrown at us. I mean why not a 2nd wave – we can’t get anybody interested in all the sex trafficking or political crimes – so it looks like the only thing that’s useful is if it is strictly personal – like you could die if you don’t pay attention. The UFO’s have always been there and have yet, after 100 years in the modern era, to invade us or anything else. So we know that they are being used as a ploy for more military money.  Let’s see, what else, China is invading us while we waffle around on the issue all while the global faction in various positions of power in the US are showing how easy it is to get Americans to cave in and willingly silence themselves. Have I forgotten anything? Probably.

For a better analysis of the whole mess watch this video – but beware, if you are not awake enough to know about some of the dicier issues and can be offended – don’t bother.

 

Shocking Revelations From FBI Investigator John DeSouza!

 

 

Skyward

Direct perception vs. metaphor; what if the only way we can perceive anything is through metaphor? It would make a thought a metaphor of a metaphor and story, a third generation of that metaphor… therefore what I think and think I know could be so wrong due to what I was taught, my whole cosmology could be off.

For instance, I was very young when I began to be aware of the ‘Space Brothers’ – Adamski young… back in the 50’s and I was not even a teenager so I was also very impressionable. Then came Star Trek and 2001, and I remember struggling with 2001, because it didn’t fit the meme of ET I had already consumed. At the very bottom of my cosmology I want ET’s to be what I learned back then and I realize I have always struggled to fit them into that vision. I struggled to survive in this world back then, and the hope that vision presented helped me to hang on.

This morning I saw that the Space Brothers meme is still quite alive and functioning in my subconscious and getting in the way of any true perception I’m trying to have. In thinking through the dream that I awoke with I realized that my programming was still going strong. I was standing outside with a whole group of people, looking at the sky as Grant Cameron was explaining about the long, classical mother ships in orbit around the planet in bands that were ‘protecting’ us that we could actually see in broad daylight. Well, in decoding that, I realized this could actually be the Starlink project and strings of satellites as the motherships. Then the idea struck me – what if they actually were a weapons based platform to actually protect us from an actual threat from space?

Then I laughed, because in considering that the next thought was (and I’m sure a lot of you have thought about this) what if, the ET meme is actually the last ‘ace’ up the sleeve of the deep state? They do have us so nicely programmed – could the ET meme be their master plan to foist a one world government on us? Everything stops as we all turn our eyes skyward. Even the smallest child on the planet knows what an ET is these days – they’ve only spent the last 50 years educating us about it. We are fully brainwashed, prepared.

Then all they would have to do is bring up ALIEN viruses and the vaccine meme will light on fire! I wouldn’t put it past those buggers to pop that on the planet, as we have also been trained to be so highly xenophobic. We are also stupid enough to fall for it. Then all they’d have to say is that 5G is a protection net for our own good and a space defense platform; it is the wackiest sci-fi plot ever and it just might work…

Then, with 5G in place and everyone vaccinated against the alien virus, imagine that it might be a way to directly implant, feed into the minds of the public, synthetic telepathic contact that makes us all feel like we are all in direct contact. We would never be able to distinguish the real from the unreal. Its been a hundred year training program, and its been very effective.

A big lie (German: große Lüge) is a propaganda technique. The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”.

“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”

― adolf hitler

tags: lies, paraphrased

And as the world falls a part, and governments crash and people die from strange viruses and food shortages, we will all be standing looking at the sky with our jaws open…

The War That Never Ended

(The ‘mass hypnosis matrix’ theory) maybe the easiest way to not alarm 7 billion souls is to not let them know what has happened? However we’ve all known for centuries that something doesn’t fit. We’ve all looked up in the sky, waiting, knowing. So many stories talk about our ‘creation’, about how our bodies were crafted and why; and its always about war.

The origin point of our genesis was always : War. Every civilization has risen and fallen on war. (the ‘colonists’ theory) We came here to this planet as refugees of war. We were running from an enemy and needed to hide out in this solar system from a great galactic war. Or, we were a bunch of traumatized souls who were given bodies to heal from a war. There has also always been somebody who has saved us – shepherded us taught us all we needed to know to survive, given us medicine, math, husbandry, because we were too ‘something’ -dumb, ill, traumatized- to have discovered it for ourselves. (the ‘savior’ theory) Always saviors have taken pity on us. We call all those stories our creation myths.

Every culture from every corner of the earth has them. They are carved in rocks. They are coded into megalithic stone buildings. They are written, sung, chanted, and woven into the identity of humanity. Its all there, the story, the history – not myths – but real. In today’s world these stories are even given through channels, those who down load information into the 3D. In the past it came through shamans and oral histories passed down for centuries.  Today many call it fantasy as they watch it play out in movies and books, but it’s there. And, its always, war.

I sometimes think catastrophism (another theory) is a form of war, and I sometimes think that we are seeing the buildup to yet another one, just as we are finally climbing out of the pit from the last one. It makes us like a wounded soldier with memory shock from battle; we don’t know who we are or why we were fighting, just that we were and we are still collectively stunned.  As a species we don’t live long enough to put it together. We finally realize that our lives are very short, for some reason, that even at 80-90 years old, we have just spiritually gotten out of our 20s, finally gotten our feet under us and then we die. When we come back, there  are no memories. We live as perpetual teenagers, never really being able to grow up. (the ‘stunted growth, neotenic’ theory)   Wash, Rinse and Repeat.

And we are not sure what to do about it – we realize something is off but not how to fix it. There are people who try to keep a history, in art and lit and song, but it always winds up reading like code that we have lost the key to. Some people speculate that it all gets recorded in our DNA and passed down through the centuries that way – but we don’t know how to read that yet, and it looks like we will not survive long enough this time to figure it out! We do know we have to hurry. We race against time, evolution and…enemies that bring….war. Maybe we wouldn’t be so destructive if we could just remember the longer cycles of our history?

Ok, so maybe there are forces out there that do not want us to remember, that think we are the scourge upon the earth – and we might be. But would it be that way if we could remember?

Would we be better able to cherish this earth, or would we be horrible to the earth and creation? (so here is where the ‘Jail Planet’ theory comes in) Right now, it is certainly obvious that we are ruled by criminals on a prison planet where the  authority is the worst of the worst. We never get to the rehabilitation part because its dog-eat-dog and if you don’t want to live that way you simply become a casualty of….WAR….

I’m really over it, but it seems that a preponderance of people here aren’t. It seems like a game that they all love playing, but really is nothing more than a bunch of looters out to grab what ever they can to take to their caves and go crazy over trying to protect. All stemming from a war dressed up like a disaster millenniums ago that we can’t remember.

(So here comes the ‘Insane Asylum’ theory) The above thought would make anyone insane and we all know it – that we are insane. Insane describes the inability to sense – be aware. Once again, we blew up our home planet and two of its moons, one of which is now Mars (war) and the other, the asteroid belt. The lives on them were totally destroyed, the souls were saved but were in such a state of shock as to be incoherent. Those souls were put in lesser bodies to spend centuries healing on this planet, knocked back evolutionarily several thousands of years to re-evolve in bodies that supposedly gave them all that time to heal. They got a do-over. But it had to go slow, because the shock made them insane – us, insane.  My thought was that there were already people living here and they agreed to help us out, but now we have over run the place and are making a mess of it.

 

(Which segways us into the ‘It’s time to leave the planet or perish’ theory, or ‘the renters lost their lease for bad behaviour’ theory) Maybe we only rent space on this planet and that’s why it costs so much to just live here. Maybe that’s where the planetary debt comes from and where part of the trillions of missing money is going to. Maybe that’s why we have income tax, birth certificates declaring us as chattel and social security numbers, oh, and if they have their way, now chips in our bodies – the mark of the beast, not in satanic terms, just that we are classed with the cattle and the dogs.

We have evolved but to our worst potentials. (‘skewed evolution’ theory here – why our DNA is constantly tinkered with) But what if we are just that nasty? We could be looked at as marauders too – that just came and took the place over – who knows? Well, who’d want us out there the way we are at the moment? Gee, some of the most world classed criminals taking it off the planet spreading the mess to the rest of the solar system and beyond? No, nope and no!

I used to think we were mostly good,  I had hope for humanity, but now, not so much. Given half a chance we could have improved. However, we persist in doing the wrong thing, the easiest thing, taking the shortest route regardless of who we hurt. It’s what we can get, not what we can build. It’s about what we can stockpile and collect in perpetuity in preparation for the next…war…because racial memory tells us: There Will ALWAYS Be A Next War. So many theories; and its always war, catastrophe, illness, insanity but never sobriety.

The message has always been: MANKIND IS FLAWED.

We have forever needed tweaking, prodding, teaching, parenting, enlightenment, ascension…. Why are we flawed? Are we flawed really, or do we just think we are flawed for some reason? How did we get that way? Why did we get that way? All of those theories above are attempts to figure it out. Is it a lie that we are flawed? It seems the whole race knows its flawed too – like we are born with that knowing. How did it get into our souls?

All religions and spiritual systems start out with the assumption that we are flawed and every system has a way to fix that and if you just hand over your sovereignty to them you might have a chance of learning it. However, you are probably too flawed to do it well enough to become un-flawed. Is the possibility of being un-flawed so far out of our grasp that we turn away from it? If left to our own selves is it possible that we would have discovered our own innate goodness instead of our flawedness? However, we all know we are stupid, blind, and wrong…

We are so flawed that we need super heroes in our cultural stories saving our bacon, because we certainly can’t – which makes us: Victims and leads us directly into looking for a savior. It certainly depowers us, keeps us from being responsible for our own lives and convinced we need a controller to survive. Here’s the rub, if religion and laws aren’t working – are broken – then we must be convinced to ask for leadership because we are…. Flawed.  It seems the CV social experiment was in most part a way to judge how much of the world pop is willing to simply swallow, hook line and sinker, any line of bullshit given them by the one percent, our saviors. How much of John Q. Public will be fearful and behave? How much more division and descent will it take to get us all to kneel to the fear?  Aaaaand we are back to hidden enemies and endless war…

Dog Germs

I’ve wanted to write about ‘the virus’ for some time now. But what to say? I don’t know enough science to give you any information that can’t be found on line, and I’m so bad at math that the stats go over my head unless someone explains them to me. Since my husband’s liver transplant and his arrival Dec.26th at home we have had to use tight sanitary protocols, not sterile, but close. I’m already stocked up on hand sanitizer, TP, PTs, Clorox wipes, gloves, masks, you name it, we have it. We have had to avoid crowds, restaurants, movies and the like anyway. And just as our restrictions were opening up, BOOM! We are back to what for us has been the last three months.

Any woman will tell you she loves her husband, but being sequestered with an ornery man for that long will test the limits of anyone’s marriage and patience. I always heard the jokes about retirement and never really thought too much about them until now. Well, he retired and got sequestered all in one day… He took over the entire household. The TV in the family room connects to our kitchen in kind of a great room. I’m trying to cook and do nourishing energetically healthy things for him while the annoying sound track of TV programs like “Shameless” and live action cops of Alaska play loudly in the background of my daily life… When I had finally had enough, I bought JV ear buds. Those things saved his life. Really.  Gotta love amazon.

Anyway, the house used to run on such a glorious schedule, everything being done before he walked in from work, house cleaning and the like, grocery shopping, meal prepping, me writing my occasional article, listening to pod casts while I vacuumed and did laundry… it was calm, ordered and chugging right along.

Yeah, three months ago that all exploded. However we have learned to deal with each other, how to stay out of each other’s back pocket, how to be more than bickering children to each other when we were upset by giving the other some breathing space, you know, normal stuff that nobody practices in the world anymore because the world doesn’t give us any time to really be with each other. We are already in the groove. It took some work, but now it is worth it. I remember back in 70’s on weekends when it used to be this way at home with my parents, before cell phones and before computers. How quickly we have forgotten how to be with other people, even those we love. With things the way they currently are, we are getting a chance to remember how to do this again.

Including our dogs. Like taking a walk with your dog while not looking at your cell phone, paying attention to the world around you and experiencing it with your dog as you walk, having a quiet conversation with your dog… they do listen. They love mental pictures by the way, if you don’t believe me send a picture of a dog treat to your dog and be ready to give him that treat, just saying. And if you’re not too full of media, they will send you images with impulses to do stuff too…like feed them dinner.

And oh yeah, the only type of germ I couldn’t protect against when my husband came home were Dog Germs. He was immediately slobbered to death, 5 days after a liver transplant. They never left his side until he was out of his worst pain. They did as much towards healing him and making him feel better as I did, maybe even more because, Dog Love, Dog Germs and all.

The Paranoid UFO

Science vs. Ufology   

Nuts and bolts vs. Phenomena   

Experiencers vs. Researchers   

Crazy vs. Sane   

TTSA vs. History   

Military vs. Political

Them vs. Us

Controllers vs. a Sane Healthy World

The list is onerous and vast and goes on forever. It’s the way we freaking humans operate! Power. Power over. Nothing shared or open or transparent. Not ever. Bless Jaques Valley for recording a history we would never know for all to read. Bless him and a number of other researchers looking into the phenomena that surrounds everything in this field.

What if the secrecy was about our natural mental/spiritual abilities and had nothing to do with UFO’s but they were used as a smoke screen to muddy the waters so that we never got to the phenomenal part of the equation??

IMO the phenomenal part of the equation is like the nerves to the ears. You may have visible ears but if the nerves that hook them up to the brain aren’t there or don’t work, then you will never ‘hear’ anything. If they cannot control what is happening in the skies, they most certainly can control our minds and they don’t need anything special like a ray gun to do it – they just need to be excellent liars…

This relationship of those who hold the information to those of us who don’t is textbook symptomology of an abusive relationship. You need only look at the literature on line about domestic abuse and it’s all there. The lying, the belittling, conning, the tension building, the explosion and the honeymoon phase. Being that this is a cycle in the larger community it takes longer to manifest – like about every 20 years the ‘next-new-thing’ appears, gets us all riled up and turns out to be a giant psy-op and even if it’s not, it is used against the community like a master manipulator in a relationship who had you believing you love broccoli, when you don’t. Its classic, its textbook. Keeping your head above water in a game like this is treacherous.

This is not to say that the recent information might not be correct…. IMO it probably is, but because of the abuse/manipulation game going on, it is now harder than ever to really know, besides, broccoli isn’t that bad… right?

It’s interesting that all the hoopla is NOT about ‘WOW! Aliens are real and they are here!’ Nope… it’s about who leaked what to whom and when because some want to say halleluiah it’s real and others want desperately to prove its all bunk.

The story that I and others waited for would occur on the last day before Reagan left office. The rumor was that Reagan would appear on TV with a live alien held in a secure compound near the Washington Mall. In the end, Reagan did not appear with the alien and UFO research went on unperturbed by the failure of the prediction. That is how ufology works. It moves from one disclosure rumor to the next. Slowly, through leaks and rumors, knowledge of the ET presence grows. Meanwhile, the classified aspects of the UFO story remain safe.

Cameron, Grant. Managing Magic: The Government’s UFO Disclosure Plan (p. 8). Itsallconnected Publishing. Kindle Edition.

What the government didn’t anticipate was that George Knapp, a respected Emmy Award-winning investigative reporter, would invite Lazar as a guest on his show in March 1989. Indeed, Knapp had an open spot and asked Lear if his buddy, who used to work at the base, could come on.  That back-lit interview Knapp did with Lazar went viral. The next thing the government knew, tour buses were going up into the mountains. The people on the tours were now looking down over the most secret base in the world, hoping to see the government testing a UFO.  Now everything done at the base became the interest of the public, thanks to Knapp’s interview with Lazar. Bill Clinton was forced to issue a Presidential Determination which kept the curious citizens back and tried to prevent them from seeing anything close up. Eventually, the story died down. The UFO community became convinced there were UFOs at the base. The media had a good unproven story, and the government continued with their secret work unaffected.

Cameron, Grant. Managing Magic: The Government’s UFO Disclosure Plan (p. 10). Itsallconnected Publishing. Kindle Edition.

And….basically this is where I sit with the newest ‘revelation’ I’m waiting to see. I suppose you could call me jaded. Been there, done that have about 10 T-shirts…. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, I need to see a therapist. There are a million different ways and variations on whether its real or not, or planted even at the highest levels to fool them so they fool us… who knows? You want real contact, you might as well start trying the CE5 method, go direct to the source. But, be careful because everybody (who is everybody, anyway?!?) knows that there are demons in the aether and you could get one of them instead of a real ET… or you might get abducted and lord knows what! Manipulation. Insidious, and slippery. It has been postulated that the first contact is always a mirror of your fears and expectations. A reflection of your base beliefs. Those beliefs coming out of a basically catholic/Christian belief system – a system that was set up to create the mind cage we all live in, a system set up to implant metaphysical fears to act like a control gate. I agree. The problem is learning to see it for what it is and getting around it. Those fears have been told over and over until they have been embedded in our DNA.

Sometimes I wonder if this is not just some giant graduation test, or if this is the dream and the real is somewhere else, or if I just gather enough information it will be clearer. Can you see the effects of being lied to, manipulated and generally messed with – the pathology – in those words? I can.

Paranoia.

And all I wanted was to be normal, and know the mystery….

 

 

 

The Admiral Wilson Papers

https://imgur.com/a/ggIFTfQ

https://richarddolanmembers.com/articles/article-ufo-leak-of-the-century-richard-dolan-analyzes-the-admiral-wilson-leak/?mc_cid=9f468f6476&mc_eid=cd01059d95

https://youtu.be/Dk7wWp7iL60


IMO: in my opinion…

This document, that Grant Cameron, Michael W. Hall, Richard Dolan and Jimmy Church have brought to light, if provenance can be proved, if actual government documents can be found that support it, is the single most important document of the 21st century for several reasons.

The first, obvious to us in this genre, being all of those years of hearing this information on the down low as back story, with little to no veracity of its paper history, with the hundreds of tendrils of other stories crisscrossing into this larger one, could be, after all basically true. Wow.

It puts people like Sgt. Clifford Stone, Command Sgt. Major Robert Dean, Dr. Steven Greer, Jim Mars, Stanton Friedman, dare I mention Kerry Cassidy, (the list is endless) – quite literally people from our recent past that have been written off as maybe slightly whacky – people who could have been forgotten in the current harassing maze of he-said-she-said horse pucky going on right now (that doesn’t even really deserve mention in light of the real true stuff) back into the equation, where they belong after careers dedicated to bringing the facts out to the public! (Don’t forget Dr. Greer has talked about this meeting for the last 20 or so years in all his talks.) We, or should I say they, have been vindicated. It feels weird. And those of us who have been through many cycles of lies and trickery, are still questioning whether it’s a psy-op. But that’s ok, in fact, it’s needed. DON’T believe anybody. Do your own research and questioning, go dig up reliable facts, then share them.

I am sure, really, they never counted on us to be as tenacious as a starving dog smelling a buried bone. We don’t just ‘Huh, maybe?’ when we see a thing of wonder like last night. No. We don’t just read paragraph by paragraph, No.

We analyze each word in the context of the last 80 years in relation to every tid bit and fact and supposition through the lens of every researcher we’ve ever read and listened to for any innuendo, missed fact, allusion that we can find and take it a part letter by letter in search for any convoluted, hidden, veiled piece of information we can find, because that’s what we have been trained to do over the last 80 years!!!!

Sigh. We will find the provenance, the connections and the threads of the story through all this and someone will write a book on the true story of it all because that’s how we roll.

Second. I am as alarmed at the rewriting, editing and spin being put on the current recrafting of the story being fed to John Q Public about UFO’s as Richard Dolan. The rebranding, the adjusting of the importance scale on various people and facts, the ignoring of provenance, the warped rewriting of history going on by the latest self-proclaimed ‘Authorities’ of the entire field, this new TTSA-Space Force- MIC money for weapons cadre, is trying to sneakily re-write history to their own advantage. Perception management. Ok, its nothing new. Everything is perception management these days. (people who want to control other people have been using terror for centuries and what is implied in the word ‘threat’ is, well, terrifying)

Big sigh, the Admiral Wilson Papers will put a big monkey wrench (funny spell check corrected monkey to money… lol that’s true too) in all that, but to do it in any meaningful way, TTSA will probably IMO, have to acknowledge this document – like spot light it on their much vaunted program and since they have gone over the same incident twice already in two, 45 minute primetime shows, my hope for any progress to something like this document feels like maybe in the next hundred years they just might get around to it… and that’s because it will supremely screw up their narrative, their spin, their purpose for letting out the information they already have. If this document is to be believed they have way more than it looks like they ever wanted to talk to us about.

However as one fellow on twitter last night stated, and I think it was the tweet of the night:

BEST TWEET OF THE NIGHT!!!

The Art of Erik Stitt @Erik_Stitt_Art

Very interesting… The docs are def legit. I’m going to enjoy sitting back and watching the shockwave repercussions of this leak. This is a “no turning back” moment. #f2b @JChurchRadio

From <https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/>

(emphasis mine.)

Because we, who have been at this for countless years and millions of reasons, will take this and run with it and we will get to the bottom of it, proving its reality whatever that may be, truth or psy-op.

We. Will. Find. Out.

Because that’s what we do.

Billy Carson just fires my brain!!

RE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsaKSnWotIY

Ep. 1023 FADE to BLACK w/ Billy Carson P3 : Time is an Illusion : LIV

The Emerald tablets were Left Behind as a guideline for the teachers of the world to teach the people – they were never meant to be hidden or secret.

-me

Never..

(Billy Carson just fires my brain!!)

We are allowed to know. In fact, we are encouraged, nay required to know what is our birthright. Those tablets were meant to teach us and help us progress. As it is right now, we are like Romulus and Remus – children set at cast into the forest, wild wolves, with no real history and no real basis for the truth.

 

Time and Timelines: like Birkland Currents in the universe and in our brains

 

Could it be that time lines interweave with each other braid and come apart and braid with other timelines and come apart and each time that happens people of a certain frequency who have changed their frequency and learned jump over to time lines that are touching that are more similar to their own frequency?

 

Can this mean that we are constantly jumping timelines as our own frequency changes?

 

Could it be that it takes a certain number of souls all on the same frequency to actualize a time line for all of humanity, like a quorum?  And by jumping to those timelines where like frequencies exist together, the more people you have on a certain time line the more actualized it becomes ?  The more real?  ( like the hundredth monkey effect – morphic resonance, the tipping point ). Maybe because the more people that join the time line the more real it will become for humanity and what we are seeing are decision points that build enough resonance to actually change the outcome of humanity?  That when enough of these come together the overall direction of humanity can then change? And the rest of humanity is simply dragged along?   Which leads to the next idea that the Mandela  effect may be what we have Left Behind to become who we are today?

This looks very much like Birkland currents in electric universe theory. And very like Bohm’s resonance theory.

 

As above: So below

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A crack in the ceiling

There is a way, in my own experience, to maintain a small crack in our armored state that is open to other perceptions or dimensions or realities, or states. I know, make some sense here… some people travel to other places in their minds, some people astral travel to other places, some people use technology, some people are used and abused with no control or choice over their experiences. Me, being a proponent of ‘both-and’ plus grounded in the biological modality of doing or achieving these things, feel that it can be done while in the normal waking state, being attentive to your inner perceptions and from a position of control and choice over the type and intensity of the situation. Once decided upon and locked in, even in sleep your choices hold and can not be subverted.

In the metaphorical back of my mind, I leave a tiny crack in the ceiling for a small discrete channel of variable frequency go out and come in, sort of like sleeping with one eye open, (it’s a ‘mom thing’) that can be noticed when there is a change and then focused on. Once focused on, there can be information exchange, conversation and perception. This way, you are on call, can receive calls (so to speak) but never vulnerably open too wide. No storm can come through by throwing a door wide open from vast pressure differences, sort of.

I like this because at this level of control I am comfortable. Just like the door to your house, its normally closed and outside unknown people can’t just come wandering through your house at their own whim. It works, it also makes you a very small target, instead of a very shiny object out there in the multiverse, and unless you are an astral warrior, you want to be on the side of dull and boring.

I have some very firm astral barriers from years of practice due to being scared out of my skin almost literally as a child. Took me forever to understand how to do it too, mainly because as a child, everything has authority over you -and we teach our kids this

I have been listening to a lot of people detailing the hoops they had to jump through to have the contact they have, in whatever form they have it, all the bells and whistles they employ to achieve it, and although maybe it’s just simple to me, (but I have a suspicion we are all like this) or maybe I’m just boring enough that not a lot of personages knock at my door, however, IMO (of course) it’s easier than all that. But we, having thousands of years of conditioning to ignore this part of our selves keep looking for keys, technique, tools, or philosophies to get the door open because we think it’s not already under our own control. Just like our children, out in that bigger realm, everybody else has control over us, but us. And…. It’s not true!

You must notice though, that we have been trained to think it is so. Now why would that be? IMO (yet again) because understanding this part of our selves would be the very fastest way to lose control over the earth population. This is one control program that has been in effect and training us for at least the last several thousand years. Also, unbelievably, there are sort of watchdogs in the otherspace to discourage those that find it, usually because we glow so brightly there until we learn to tone it down a bit that we are easy to spot. Easy fodder for hypospace, instead of hyperspace.

There are rules in my space… and they involve things like where my space starts and ends and how far you may intrude upon it, who you are and what you want and what your intent is. Just as people are obvious in physical form – so they are in otherspace. I don’t like being shut down, nor do I like being an open house, so that’s why there’s a crack in my ceiling – lol so I can hear the phone ring, but not offer it to anybody who happens to wander by.

It was a radio show, not a court of law….

I was listening to the Jimmy Church Radio Show last night with guest Richard Dolan. I followed Richard’s chat, and I was on twitter. During the commercial breaks I listened to Richard Dolan’s conversation with his chat.

Richard Dolan is an academic, an established debater, historian and knows the rules of proper conduct in a conversation/debate. He is also a very ethical man and will not overstep the guidelines for elucidation of an idea because he knows that it’s extremely unproductive.

For those who do not know:

Ten Simple Rules For Debating

Posted by Nullus Maximus

A significant amount of my recent work has been written in response to arguments made by other libertarian thinkers. As such, the time is ripe for a guide to how this is best done. This article will take the reader through the process of an exchange of ideas from start to finish, and explain my ten simple rules for debating. Those who follow these rules are guaranteed to become more successful debaters, as well as less stressed and overworked.

  1. Pick your battles. While a person of little renown may have enough time to engage with whomever one pleases at whatever length one desires, people who have less time to spend engaging in debates must choose which opponents to engage and which to ignore, as well as how long to engage each opponent. It is best to have a consistent rubric for this, which will be discussed further in rules 2 and 9.
  2. Engage only those worthy of being engaged. Some people are capable of maintaining a rational discourse, while other people cannot seem to communicate without resorting to personal attacks, profanity, threats, and other such uncivil behavior. Some people have interesting and novel insights, while other people insist upon bringing up points which have been refuted a thousand times. Some people are experts in the fields of which they speak, while other people do not stick to their lasts. Some people make the effort to properly support an argument, while other people Gish gallop. A person’s behavior in this regard is a strong indicator of whether that person is worthy of one’s attention. Note that other debaters will judge you by a similar standard, so be the kind of person that someone else would be willing to debate.
  3. Do your research. If you know a topic in great detail, you will be more able to counter any argument your opponent may make. An uninformed debater is an incompetent debater. An unprepared debater is a sloppy debater. Also, make sure that the sources you study are reliable. If the opponent is competent, a misinformed debater will be an embarrassed debater.
  4. Do not argue to convince the opponent; argue to convince a third party. In many cases, a person worthy of being engaged will be firmly entrenched in a position, and it may even be against the nature of the format for your opponent to come over to your side. Focus instead on convincing the audience, whether they be people watching a live debate or reading a correspondence. This methodology is stated explicitly in some debate formats, but it is sound strategy regardless.
  5. Base your arguments upon logic (logos), not emotion (pathos) or authority (ethos). A debate is properly won by using reason and evidence to demonstrate that one’s position is superior to that of one’s opponent. Detouring into appeals to emotion can help one connect with the audience or provoke an opponent into a misstep, but this does not advance one’s case in a rigorous manner. Appealing to the authority of oneself or someone else can dissuade a weak opponent or convince a less intelligent audience, but attempting this against a strong opponent in front of a knowledgeable audience is a recipe for disaster.
  6. Relentlessly attack logical fallacies and weak arguments. It is important to point out every shortcoming that you can find in your opponent’s case. Doing so will make you more skilled in identifying logical fallacies and weak arguments, which means that opponents will be less able to get away with sloppy reasoning in future debates. Do not worry about being pedantic; your job is to find all weaknesses in your opponent’s case and illuminate them to make your case appear stronger by comparison.
  7. Focus on the task at hand. A debate can easily go off track, especially if the subject matter is wide, deep, or both. Avoid making arguments that neither support your case nor attack your opponent’s case. Only go into the weeds if your opponent takes you there; the person who begins the foray into many different minutiae is usually running out of solid logic and evidence.
  8. Destroy arguments, not people. Be respectful of your opponent, or at least be as respectful of your opponent as he or she is of you. Resorting to personal attacks (or escalating them if they are already in use) is a refuge of a person with weak arguments, and it will make people less willing to consider your case on its merits. Remember, your job is to defeat your opponent’s arguments, not his or her character.
  9. Know when to quit. There comes a point in every debate at which further discussion has diminishing returns or even becomes completely pointless. It is important to learn to identify that point and stop there. Sometimes this will be clear; an opponent may even announce that a particular round will be his or her closing argument. If this happens, respond with a closing argument of your own and be finished; do not repeatedly pummel the opponent after he or she has left the debate. This may also be the case in a timed or response-limited debate, in which case one should abide by the rules of the format. In other cases, it will be a matter of personal judgment to decide to walk away from a debate.
  10. Handle both defeat and victory appropriately. No one likes a sore loser or a bad winner. If you lose a debate, reflect on how and why you lost. Then, take the necessary steps to avoid losing in the same manner in a future debate. This may involve more study of the debate topic, reviewing logical fallacies, or even changing one’s position on an issue. If you win, do not gloat or boast. Accept victory graciously, then check your discourse for arguments that could have been stronger or presented more effectively. From <https://www.zerothposition.com/2016/04/21/ten-simple-rules-for-debating/>   (Italic emphasis mine)

Jimmy Church is a radio host. What we were listening to last night was a radio show. Not a court of law. Jimmy has said this many times on his show, he will interview anybody. He will give them as much rope as they want. His job is to make the guest comfortable and elicit the conversation, while asking the questions that everybody wants answers to, and that is a gift he brings to the show. It is not, nor has it ever been, nor can I conceive that it ever will be a court of law or a place where emotional bashing will ever be allowed to occur! I have heard him politely hang up on people who try to take the conversation there. Those are his ethics. He will not step beyond them, just as Richard Dolan will not.

What just makes my jaw drop is the preponderance of loud noise people can make when they do not know about critical thinking or debate. The loudest voice never wins, nor does the meanest. Period. There was so much verbal battery going on in the comments last night that I was floored. What has happened to everybody’s minds???

It was not the purpose of either person speaking to provide evidence of any kind. This wasn’t even a debate, it was a conversation. It certainly wasn’t a court of law…

In a court of law:

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof

In almost every legal proceeding, the parties are required to adhere to important rules known as evidentiary standards and burdens of proof. These rules determine which party is responsible for putting forth enough evidence to either prove or defeat a particular claim and the amount of evidence necessary to accomplish that goal.

The Burden of Proof

The burden of proof determines which party is responsible for putting forth evidence and the level of evidence they must provide in order to prevail on their claim. In most cases, the plaintiff (the party bringing the claim) has the burden of proof.

The burden of proof has two components. First, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of production, which has also been referred to as the burden of going forward. As the terms suggest, this burden requires the plaintiff to put forth evidence in the form of witness testimony, documents, or objects. After the plaintiff presents his or her case-in-chief, the burden of production shifts to the defendant, who then has the opportunity to provide evidence either rebutting the plaintiff’s evidence or supporting the defendant’s own arguments.

Evidentiary Standards in Civil Cases

Preponderance of the Evidence

Second, the plaintiff must satisfy the burden of persuasion. This burden determines which standard of proof the plaintiff must follow in presenting evidence to the judge or jury. A standard of proof determines the amount of evidence the plaintiff or defendant needs to provide in order for the jury to reach a particular determination. In most civil cases, the burden of persuasion that applies is called “a preponderance of the evidence.” This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor of the plaintiff if the plaintiff is able to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least 51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome.

Clear and Convincing Evidence

In some civil cases, the burden of proof is elevated to a higher standard called “clear and convincing evidence.” This burden of proof requires the plaintiff to prove that a particular fact is substantially more likely than not to be true. Some courts have described this standard as requiring the plaintiff to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true. This standard sets a higher threshold than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but it does not quite rise to the widely recognized standard used in criminal cases, known as “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Substantial Evidence

In administrative law proceedings, the standard of proof that most commonly applies is the substantial evidence standard. This standard requires the plaintiff or moving party to provide enough evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a particular conclusion.

Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Cases

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is the highest standard of proof that may be imposed upon a party at trial, and it is usually the standard used in criminal cases. This standard requires the prosecution to show that the only logical explanation that can be derived from the facts is that the defendant committed the alleged crime, and that no other logical explanation can be inferred or deduced from the evidence. The United States Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), described this standard as “such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof . . . . What is required is not an absolute or mathematical certainty, but a moral certainty.”

Credible Evidence

Another common standard of proof used in some criminal law proceedings is the credible evidence standard. Credible evidence is evidence that is not necessarily true but that is worthy of belief and worthy of the jury’s consideration. Some have defined this standard as requiring the jury to conclude that the evidence is natural, reasonable, and probable in order for it to be credible.

Evidentiary Standards and Burdens of Proof Resources

Overview

Articles Web Resources Laws Glossary Law Blogs Lawyers & Attorneys

From <https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/evidentiary-standards-burdens-proof/>

 

Further, IMO (here it comes) when evidentiary standards and burden of proof are applied to the UFO question, we do not even know the scope of the situation. For instance, there is a preponderance of opinion out there that consciousness needs to added into the equation to properly understand what a reasonable question could/should be. From a quantum physics aspect looking at consciousness, this makes sense because of the ‘observer effect’ and entanglement. From an experiencer aspect it appears to be the whole of the experience from the preponderance of the data.

BEYOND UFOS: THE SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONTACT WITH NON HUMAN INTELLIGENCE (VOLUME ONE)

by REINERIO HERNANDEZ (Author), RUDY SCHILD (Author), JON KLIMO (Author)

This 820 page book details the academic research findings of the world’s first comprehensive multi-language quantitative and qualitative 5 year academic research study on individuals that have had UFO related contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)– The FREE Experiencer Research Study.

Over the last 5 years FREE has collected detailed responses to 3 extensive quantitative and qualitative surveys from over 4,200 individuals from over 100 countries. Our survey findings from these thousands of “Experiencers” contradict much of what is circulating in mainstream materialist Ufology.

Our academic book will establish a new paradigm for viewing the UAP (UFO) Contact Phenomenon. FREE argues that “Consciousness” and the paranormal and psychic aspects of this phenomenon is the key to understanding this complex phenomenon instead of the traditional materialist perspective of “nuts & bolt’s” Ufology.

The Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial and Extraordinary Experiences, or FREE, is a 501c3 Academic Research Not for Profit Foundation. FREE was co-founded by the late Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, Dr. Rudy Schild, an Emeritus Research Astronomer at the Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics at Harvard University, Australian researcher Mary Rodwell and Rey Hernandez, an Attorney and Experiencer who was a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of California at Berkeley. FREE is comprised of retired academic professors and lay researchers who have been researching the field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and contact with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) for more than 30 years. The Executive Director of FREE is Harvard Astrophysicist Dr. Rudy Schild. From  <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07G3JLS3H/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1>

 

And this doesn’t even scratch the surface of what needs to be added to the equation or quantified and debated. And yet – we descend into gossip and snarky attitudes over one little tiny insignificant piece of the puzzle and deem ourselves capable of not only presenting all the facts, but arguing them in a legal manner. This field is not about just one tiny little question, nor one tiny little person (or several) people. It is about the whole planet!

 

Wake up! Put your head on the right way and act like it’s not empty in there!!!!!   grrrrrrrrrrr

 

 

 

 

 

With Egg on my Face

I sit before this electronic piece of equipment that is my doorway to the greater world, with egg on my face….

Meaning : ‘To have/caught with egg on your face‘ means to be made to look foolish or to be embarrassed. Origin: “Random House Dictionary of American Slang, Vol. 1, A-G” by J.E. Lighter (Random House, New York, 1994): “have egg on (one’s) face — to look foolish or be embarrassed. https://www.quora.com/What-does-caught-with-egg-on-your-face-mean-and-what-is-its-…

It’s an old idiom, so there’s what it means. Yep, I’m embarrassed for several reasons. One, because I unwittingly let myself get caught in the ongoing hooha I was disparaging in my oh so acerbic opines, and two because the more I felt around inside about this issue, the more I understood it as a lesson in being kind, and collecting all the data I could before I did opine and make an ass of myself. Literally. Lastly, it was a kick in my morally oh so righteous ass that askes ‘Since when did you walk a mile in their shoes?’

So, I’m gonna dust myself off, get up, try again with maybe a little more empathy in my heart aaaand, opine again. This kind of character bashing used to be called slander and defamation of character and back before the internet when we used to have to print stuff like this on paper to make a point, could get you thrown in jail for it. It is one thing to report a verified fact, and another just to give your opinions.

I am guilty of having a bad attitude, justifiable or not to pin it on anyone else as their fault is really immature. I’m 65 – I should know better. Really. I am guilty of listening to others without doing the research – which in this case would have saved my sorry ass from looking like a sorry ass – and forming an opinion on yet another opinion. Just shoot me now. (I suppose this stems from being angry at others for doing it and thusly having the karmic pleasure of doing it myself so I could understand why… ahem)

Here’s the thing. We all complain about what a mess this field is from the half-truths linked to the truth, from the outright dis-information to the lies being almost indistinguishable from the truth.

true /tro͞o/

in accordance with fact or reality.

rightly or strictly so called; genuine.

said when conceding a point in argument or discussion.
accurate or exact.

(interestingly this was an old German word for truce )

We all know about the ‘Truth Embargo’, we all know we have been lied to officially.

So really the only truth we have is that we have been told untruth for the last 80 years.

So you see, how all of us can get testy. Just a bit… the whole game has been crafted so well, and is so insidious, that we are all ( I was going to say a bit, but this qualifies for full frontal) paranoid.

For What It Is Worth

Buffalo Springfield

There’s something happening here

What it is ain’t exactly clear

There’s a man with a gun over there

Telling me I got to beware

I think it’s time we stop, children, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

There’s battle lines being drawn

Nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong

Young people speaking their minds

Getting so much resistance from behind

It’s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

What a field-day for the heat

A thousand people in the street

Singing songs and carrying signs

Mostly say, hooray for our side

It’s s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Paranoia strikes deep

Into your life it will creep

It starts when you’re always afraid

You step out of line, the man come and take you away

We better stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, hey, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, now, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Stop, children, what’s that sound

Everybody look what’s going down

Songwriters: Stephen Stills

For What It Is Worth lyrics © Warner/Chappell Music, Inc

So here we are. In the mist of another revolution, one not so fun as the sixties and way more important. What are we going to do about it? How are we going to handle it? What kind of example will we set for those who will see this as it transforms the world we live in. We need to get better at this. We really do.

I really do.